Comment Re:Really? (Score 1) 180
Are you suggesting he intentionally neglected to add an SPF record just so he could make a big stink about getting blacklisted by spamhaus?
Are you suggesting he intentionally neglected to add an SPF record just so he could make a big stink about getting blacklisted by spamhaus?
Hanlon's Razor.
The guy is utterly clueless.
I have never worked anywhere else but on an open floorplan.
And yet:
I know (from experience) I would be less productive in a cubicle or in my own office. I know (again from experience) this is the case for the majority of people.
From your vast experience not working anywhere else but on an open floorplan, and your vast experience not being anybody else but yourself?
BSP? Why do vendors still insist on using that antiquated bullshit TLA? If your damn peripheral code isn't in the mainline tree, it probably sucks. Hooray for shoddy code developed by interns.
Wait, just about every SoC ARM kernel is built from a fork. Idiots.
"It is a fair summary of constitutional history that the landmarks of our liberties have often been forged in cases involving not very nice people." - Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter
Speaks volumes about the
Are you suggesting they are unrepentant White Knights?
She's a witch! BURN HER!
The difference is the founder of Christianity was against killing people unlike Mohammed.
Deus Vult.
If by "early adopter" you mean "drooling, clueless moron", then yes, your translation is correct.
It can't be compiled by me, from source code.
Iain M. Banks - the last "true Scotsman" of sci fi authors. He will be missed. Nobody comes close.
"Well regulated", relevant or not, means well equipped and trained. Always has. Not sure what you think it means, you haven't said.
As far as "consequences" go, the states with the strongest laws have the highest incidence of violent crime.
You sure you want to trot out the fallacy that prohibition is effective? Didn't work out very well for alcohol, utterly failed for MJ.
The definition of "well regulated" has not changed, and Heller/McDonald specifically dismantle the infantile "militia" argument:
[T]he activities [the Amendment] protects are not limited to militia service, nor is an individual's enjoyment of the right contingent upon his or her continued or intermittent enrollment in the militia.
Furthermore, under US v. Miller, the 2nd Amendment covers arms "commonly used for self defense", which certainly does not exclude "military" weapons, especially since the 2A specifically protected state of the art (at the time) firearms equipped by infantry.
There is basically nothing about your post which is even remotely factual - just typical partisan whining.
You'd also have to convince the AI to not actually try to learn anything new, or it might actually try to confirm that the things you assert are, in fact, true (or at least that you've given it non-obvious, falsifiable truisms to follow).
The OP assumes religious beliefs is emotional and irrational. That's false. Discussion over.
Agreed, religious beliefs are emotional and irrational.
The solution of this problem is trivial and is left as an exercise for the reader.
