I haven't done the actual math but I think it would be either 2 or 1 depending on whether you started with an odd or even number of companies...
That's why I asked the question. I think you are talking about watts/m^2 averaged over 24 hours and I'm talking about watts/m^2 at solar noon. In other words, I think both figures are correct because they are different figures. I did use the phrase "factual error," and I really should not have because I think it was me missing the "real figure" you were using. And my original question was free of accusation because I was genuinely only asking for clarification. So this is, I think, an example of violent agreement. So please ignore my loaded reply (which also wasn't intended as an accusation because it still wasn't clear to me).
So, to sum up, sorry for the rhetoric, and thanks for the clarification.
I was trying to figure out why your insolation number was so much less than what I have personally observed and your number makes sense for a diurnal average (which is what you were using, yes?)
Thanks!
That's beautiful, except the 1300 watt figure is already an average. I'm by no means an expert, but I have had a long time interest in solar PV, and the energy at the surface where I live for a flat plate collector aimed at solar noon is quite close to 1000 watts per square meter. Now, a mono or plycrystalline silicon panel, with its indirect bandgap absorption is only going to collect something on the order of 1/5 to 1/10 of that energy, but that doesn't change the fact that it is there.
I actually agree with the overall gist of the original poster's argument. I just think when your rhetoric is expressing agitation at "bad science" and you then go on to make an argument that contains a serious error of fact, well, it undermines one's authority.
I'm not jumping on a high horse here myself. I once in a loud and angry online debate confused hydrocarbons and carbohydrates. We all make mistakes. I expressed mine as a question. I wanted to understand where the figure came from because it didn't match my direct experience with PVs at 45 degrees north.
Insolation at the top of the atmosphere is approximately 1360 watts per square meter. Where do you get "342?" Are you perhaps considering only part of the spectrum?
May I just point out re: your sig the phrase is "intents and purposes" not "intensive purposes."
This is nothing to do with Go, Java, C++, or Google. Or how many words are defined in the OED.
Why? I have always believed it is morally wrong to allow stupid people to keep their money.
"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein