Comment Re:What what what? (Score 4, Funny) 647
I'm quite sure there will be a new trial, and this glitch in the matrix will be corrected thoroughly.
I'm quite sure there will be a new trial, and this glitch in the matrix will be corrected thoroughly.
Yeah, if your definition of "sell" includes paying other countries to get rid of our surplus wind and solar energy on windy and sunny days, the yes, we "sell" energy.
To understand this, I think we need to make clear the difference between sexuality and pornography. For example, lots of shows show girls in bikinis on the beach, or strippers dancing with a pole - that's pornography.
Your definition of pornography is quite different then my definition. If the girl (or boy, for that matter) is clothed, it is not pornography. As an example for a even stricter definition of pornography, in Germany, for anything to count as pornography, it has at least to show penetration, or depict genitals in a "provoking" manner (e.g. an erect penis, or a slose-up shout of a vagina.)
There may be few countries that meet all proposals, but there are scores of countries that meet at least one of them.
wow, you do need more amps... I simply reach over and turn the volume up so even when they start screaming at the top of their lungs I still cant hear them.
No, what you really need is this. With the right frequency, you could probably bounce them out of the door.
Apparently it's blamed for the tsunami.
Yeah, and everyone was blaming it on the earthquake. But it was the moon all along! And he would have gotten away with it, too, if it hadn't been for that meddling kids!
They could use 10/8. This would never be routed to the internet, but would be a syntactically correct IP address (and more compareable to the 555 telephone numbers, which are also usually syntacticaly correct)
Shamelessly copied from the youtube comments:
she's really very smart. She squirted out that stream of technobabble to cover her exit, went back to her cubicle, cat'd a shell script to track the guy's IP address, opened a random VB file to display in case her boss (who happens to be a big VB fan) walked by, whipped up the GUI with Tcl/Tk, and spent the next 15 minutes looking for a better job.
Actually, "VisualBasic" was probably just product placement. I hope it generated lots of support calls to Redmond.
And you say there are no funny comments on YouTube!
Your car will probably have a lot more then just two busses. It will probably even have ECUs that are conected to more then two busses. However, I'd guess that in theroy the network of ECUs and busses will be fully connected, e.g. most systems report data to the dashboard, so that will be a point where many busses will meet. (Not that this would help taking over the bus or safety relevant systems in any relevant way)
That's simply wrong. Lots of safety relevant systems, like ESP, communicate via CAN (or FlexRey in more modern cars). So, in theory, if you hijacked the whole bus you could pretty easily kill everyone inside the car. In praxis, however, it's not quite that simple. e.g. the bus driver of a FlexRay bus will electrically prevent sending any data outside of your designated timeslot, so you can't override data send by other ECUs. (Not to mention that the only place data from the entertainment system and from safety related systems will meet is probably the dashboard, and that's pretty much a dead end).
Your definition is the definition of NP, not NP complete. NP is the set of all problems that are in NP and NP hard (i.e. all problems in NP can be reduced in polynomial time to a problem in NP-complete). If P=NP, all problems in NP can be reduced in polynomial time to any other problem in NP (because they can be solved in polynomial time)
Mod this up, and mod GP -1, plain wrong.
Who gives a fuck if factorization is NP complete or not, that doesn't matter in the slightest.
Nitpick: If P=NP, then factorisation, or any other problem in NP, is NP complete.
Wrong. If P=NP, all problems in NP (including NP complete and Co-NP problems) are solveable in polynomial time.
Not to bust anyone's bubble, but the factoring problem is actually not known to be NP completely and evidence points to the fact that it is no, since if it could be shown to be then this would prove that NP=Co-NP. Similarly, the discrete logarithm problem is also not known to be NP-complete. Therefore, public key cryptosystems should be fine.
TL;DR - No encryption schemes will be broken if it is proved that P=NP.
You got that wrong. If P=NP, then NP=Co-NP, so your public key cryptosystems are broken. (Also, if P=NP, all problems in P are NP complete)
According to the (slightly out-of-date) article, the whole of Europe sends less spam than the US. I'm quite sure there are more computers in Europe than in the US, as the population is more than 60% larger (only counting EU. The spam level in the article is likely about the whole continent, which has about 130% the population of the US), and the developement level is similar.
And it should be the law: If you use the word `paradigm' without knowing what the dictionary says it means, you go to jail. No exceptions. -- David Jones