Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:"Precious Bandwidth"? (Score 1) 505

#1 is an isolated incident which is not representative. It was also widely publicized and led to several rulings saying that IPs did not identify individuals.

Re #2, you have failed to show that Cox or any ISP has actually enforced their scare clause, or that it is a legally enforcable contractual clause.

That is all.

Comment Re:"Precious Bandwidth"? (Score 1) 505

I'll grant you 3 as reasonable. I think 1 and 2 are not; I think they're spreading Fear, Uncertainly, and Doubt. You don't have a reasonable basis for 1 and 2, and you're too much of a coward to find out. I'm not a coward. If an ISP wants to try to shut off my service due to unconscionable terms in their TOS, they can do so, I'll get another ISP, and they'll get a lawsuit.

Stepping back into the real world, there is no evidence that #1 or #2 have every happened in enough numbers to worry. I'm more likely to get hit by a car crossing the street in 10 minutes from now. Fearing less likely events is absurd.

Comment Re:Too bad it probably violates all current TOS (Score 1) 505

See above. SFLan guy here, operated a wide variety of open APs since '97 or. No problems with TOS, because those TOS are unenforceable. I'd love if some ISP would try to enforce: that's why I've got an EFF lawyer's phone # in my contacts. They won't. So you're FUD, just FUD, simply FUD.

Slashdot Top Deals

An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says 'Beam me up, Scotty'.

Working...