At least in Firefox, "Zoom Out" is also an option.
Very Medieval, but do you mean something like the "Fourth Estate" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_estate
or the "Fifth Estate" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Estate ?
the other Estates http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Estate#Third_Estate
A link http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/newest-attack-your-credit-card-atm-shims?t51hb&hpg1=mp in the original story, entitled "Newest Attack on your Credit Card: ATM Shims" has some interesting information:
"The shim needs to be extremely thin and flexible. In fact it must be less than 0.1mm"
"The shim is inserted using a "carrier card" that holds the shim, inserts it into the card slot and locks it into place on the internal reader contacts."
"Once inserted, the shim is not visible from the outside of the machine. The shim then performs a man-in-the-middle attack between an inserted credit card and the circuit board of the ATM machine."
"flexible shims are recently being mass produced and widely used in certain parts of Europe"
"Diebold released five new anit-skimming protection levels for its ATM devices june 1st 2010...Unfortunately, none of these helps with the shim skimming attack. That problem has yet to be solved mechanically yet."
http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/04/27/2310234
and my comment to the first story: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1213805&cid=27741803
I'm guessing the inventor's statistics "In the office environment, 52% of respondents left their machines on for remote access, and 35% did so to support applications running in the background, of which e-mail and IM were most popular (47%)." are still true.
http://mesl.ucsd.edu/yuvraj/research/documents/Somniloquy-NSDI09-Yuvraj-Agarwal.pdf
Is this the whole "piece" he wrote?
TIA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistically_significant>
"In statistics, a result is called statistically significant if it is unlikely to have occurred by chance. "A statistically significant difference" simply means there is statistical evidence that there is a difference; it does not mean the difference is necessarily large, important, or significant in the common meaning of the word....
The significance level is usually represented by the Greek symbol, (alpha). Popular levels of significance are 5%, 1% and 0.1%. If a test of significance gives a p-value lower than the -level, the null hypothesis is rejected...."
Bandwidth and interference/reliability are good enough reasons for me not to use WIFI when I don't have to.
But, just because "security" is not (or weakly) configured out of the box, and a lot of users don't bother to read and learn how to configure their wifi device, why should security be a one of those reason (assuming WPA and higher) not to use wifi? Is there a new flaw with WPA (and higher? Yes I know about the TKIP weakness.
Old programmers never die, they just hit account block limit.