Awwww c'mon. This is just plain silly. Since the late 80s, "Fortran" on most major computing platforms has been nothing more than front end language parser for a multi-pass compiler system
... just like "C" and "Pascal". Whatever language you choose, they all pass their assembly output to the same back-end assembler, and binary machine code generated is pretty generic.
Back when I was in college, I maintained a Fortran77 program that was a custom built TCP/IP client-server system. But wait! F77 didn't know what a socket was! right. The network code was written in C and compiled into object code which was directly linked into the F77 project.
Great. So there are these massive libraries written in Fortran to do wonderful things. Best case scenario is you can link them directly into your language of choice. Worst case, call them from the scripted language of your choice with a wrapper
...
Swig anyone?
Bottom line? Program in what you are comfortable with. Would your peers would frown on your efforts if you learned anything but ALGOL? Fine. Use ALGOL. There are valuable lessons to be learned in any language. Strong vs weak typed, functional vs object oriented, structure, best practices
... hell, how to write "fast" code. I've been a programmer for near 20 years and I'm still learning that lesson on a daily basis.
The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher
esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.
- Nietzsche