Comment Re:Insanity (Score 1) 147
This is not a popular opinion so I am going to be downvoted for pointing this out, but the second definition of steal (at least according to dictionary.com, so apply what worth you will to that) is:
"2. to appropriate (ideas, credit, words, etc.) without right or acknowledgment."
So, at least according to that definition, steal can be applied to cases of copyright infringement.
Other examples of the word steal being used without anything actually being physically taken from its owner:
"The player on first is about to steal 2nd."
"That actor sure stole the show."
Personally, I find the pedantry over the word steal in regards to copyright infringement to not contribute meaningfully to the discussion in anyway especially considering that the loaded nature of the word is not in regards to whether the owner was deprived of something, but more in regards to the ethical nature of the activity. The word steal in this context conveys illicit behaviour, and so one could argue that it begs the question when you believe that copyright infringement is not actually illicit (or should not be illicit).