Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Open the pod bay doors (Score 1) 401

There is a reason your tagged flamebait, and it has alot to do with ignorance and inability to read and comprehend.

but Lemme spell it out for you so you can be educated..

P.O.D.S. is the actual branding for that company, it is an acronym for Portable On Demand Storage..

The Logo and Service Mark are eseentially the 4 letters done in block format white on red background.. which is all designed to reinforce the fact that this is in fact an acronym and not a word.

So yah despite your apparent inability to read lemme give you some links to basic info on the various subjects presented:

Trademark http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark

The pertinent issue here is summed up as follows :

Maintaining rights

Trademarks rights must be maintained through actual lawful use of the trademark. These rights will cease if a mark is not actively used for a period of time, normally 5 years in most jurisdictions. In the case of a trademark registration, failure to actively use the mark in the lawful course of trade, or to enforce the registration in the event of infringement, may also expose the registration itself to become liable for an application for the removal from the register after a certain period of time on the grounds of "non-use". It is not necessary for a trademark owner to take enforcement action against all infringement if it can be shown that the owner perceived the infringement to be minor and inconsequential. This is designed to prevent owners from continually being tied up in litigation for fear of cancellation. An owner can at any time commence action for infringement against a third party as long as it had not previously notified the third party of its discontent following third party use and then failed to take action within a reasonable period of time (called acquiescence). The owner can always reserve the right to take legal action until a court decides that the third party had gained notoriety which the owner 'must' have been aware of. It will be for the third party to prove their use of the mark is substantial as it is the onus of a company using a mark to check they are not infringing previously registered rights. In the US, owing to the overwhelming number of unregistered rights, trademark applicants are advised to perform searches not just of the trademark register but of local business directories and relevant trade press. Specialized search companies perform such tasks prior to application.
All jurisdictions with a mature trademark registration system provide a mechanism for removal in the event of such non use, which is usually a period of either three or five years. The intention to use a trademark can be proven by a wide range of acts as shown in the "Wooly Bull" and "Ashton v Harlee" cases.
In the U.S., failure to use a trademark for this period of time, aside from the corresponding impact on product quality, will result in abandonment of the mark, whereby any party may use the mark. An abandoned mark is not irrevocably in the public domain, but may instead be re-registered by any party which has re-established exclusive and active use, and must be associated or linked with the original mark owner. If a court rules that a trademark has become "generic" through common use (such that the mark no longer performs the essential trademark function and the average consumer no longer considers that exclusive rights attach to it), the corresponding registration may also be ruled invalid.
For examples, see trademark distinctiveness.
Unlike other forms of intellectual property (e.g., patents and copyrights) a registered trademark can, theoretically, last forever. So long as a trademark's use is continuous a trademark holder may keep the mark registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by filing Section 8 Affidavit(s) of Continuous Use as well as Section 9 Applications for renewal, as required.
Specifically, once registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office the owner of a trademark is required to file a Section 8 Affidavit of Continuous Use to maintain the registration between the 5th and 6th year anniversaries of the registration of the mark or during the 6-month grace period following the 6th-year anniversary of the registration.[9] Note, if the Section 8 Affidavit is filed during the 6-month grace period additional fees to file the Affidavit with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office will apply.[10]
In addition to requirement above, U.S. trademark registrations are also required to be renewed on or about every 10-year anniversary of the registration of the trademark. The procedure for 10-year renewals is somewhat different from that for the 5th-6th year renewal. In brief, registrants are required to file both a Section 8 Affidavit of Continuous Use as well as a Section 9 Application for Renewal every ten years to maintain their registration.[11]

That was taken from the wikipedia article referenced above.. if you cannot comprehend that.. I suggest the library or a lawyer to discuss the various details involving Trademarks and how they differ from patents etc.

Comment Re:Open the pod bay doors (Score 1) 401

Doesn't matter when it was incepted, this is *not* about patents or creation date.. this is about trademark/service marks.. which are by definition generic terms that are attached to specific products and marketed (the company using them creates the value attached to them)

But yes apparently the videopod has been in development for the last 12 years which predates the release and marketing of iPod..

Of course there are cases where people cannot use their own name due to it being trademarked (in some cases 30-50 years prior to their birth heh)

Comment Re:Open the pod bay doors (Score 5, Interesting) 401

Its also written into law that if you do not "rigorously defend" trademarks/service marks, they can be ruled in the public domain ..

You also to pass a reasonability test... first off PODS storage is *not* actually called or branded as such, they are an acronym for Portable On Demand Storage (a side business of Public Storage iirc).. secondly its not "pod" as a unique name, its about Pod as part of a name in context of consumer electronics devices..

Regardless of how long the video pod device has been in gestation or internally named as such, the fact of the matter is that Apple has spent billions promoting the iPod in that market, and as such any newcomer to market has to adapt.. not the other way around..

For case studies on Copyright/Trademark defense you should look up Kleenex, Xerox, Lexis-Nexis vs Toyota(Lexus), Infinity vs Nissan (Infinity branded cars) for some of the history (from both sides of the argument as well as "equal vs equal" battles in the case of the Infinity trademark.

Its *reasonable* to state that a consumer seeing a VideoPod in a consumer electronics store would assume it to be related to iPods in some way.. that same reasonable assumption cannot be said regarding Pipeline management, Moving supplies or seeds (though I think you are reaching very firmly into ludicrous land when you grabbed at that one)

its not again about seeing "any use of the generic syllable pod in a product name.. " but rather the appending of pod to a product name in such a way that it implies a relationship to iPod/etc

Your guess is very wrong, the defendant in this suit is coming out with a product 10 years after billions of advertising have been spent on ipod/ipad/etc and trying to ride coat tails.. and using this as "free advertising" for a product that has not made it to market despite 12 years of work on it.. remember naming is not like patents.. even if he had INTERNALLY named the product VideoPod years before apple filed its first use of the iPod trademark.. the fact that he was not in fact using it in any way and had not defended it means he loses it

Comment Re:Compare game console lockout (Score 1) 547

It was actually atari 2600 with first lockout system ... Though it was not hardware but rather contract based.. they went to court against Activision who was formed with the intent of defrauding Atari out of cartridge royalties by producing carts without buying them through Atari.. this (and the lawsuit that was lost by Atari over the Honor System they went by) is the reason why Nintendo put the "is this a real cartridge" check in the Famicom/NES.

Comment Re:Postal Service (Score 1) 410

Except that the truck was already there unless you live seriously outside the norm the major carriers all move through every street in america every single day they operate.. you can say they waste time/energy/gas stopping the truck getting out and waiting for you to answer the door..

its not a "special 20 mile trip out of the distribution center just for your package" its just one more stop on the endless route that they do every day..

The reason for the requirement for signature/delivery to the billing address is not the shippers its the sellers/credit card companies who used to get hammered with mass fraud..

Comment This is rediculous paid for report (Score 1) 410

It presumes a set of criteria that are illogical and impossible in the real world.. and is an effort to stem the tide of avoiding high street overcharging by shopping online where there is significantly more competition.

This info would only be partially true if delivery vehicles where dispatched from the distribution center to your house/office for ONLY your orders.. and not as is actual practice running routes that include not just your order from shop a, but in many cases hundreds of individual orders from hundreds of shops every single time the lorry leaves the distribution center.

Granted rural locations are likely not seeing 4-5 different delivery firms making full routes of the entire streetmap every single day.. but even so.. they seem to be comparing *cost of a normal vehicle for a family or individual" vs "cost of running a delivery lorry with nothing but 1 package on it" but even then the fact of the matter is that if a single car has to drive 30 km round trip and that takes a liter of petrol.. to purchase an ipod... it would have to cost the delivery service that same liter of petrol to deliver that single package to you.. which clearly it does not.. even if a lorry is only getting 10km per liter its likely delivering far more packages per liter than any personal vehicle is likely to accomplish.

In short this report is a paid for by city center/high street shopping interests who wish to maintain high margins by stemming the flow of sales away from online back to their high priced and highly inefficient retail locations.

Comment Ditch the win7 box.. (Score 1) 516

Get one of the little 200-300$ book sized atom/ion devices such as the revo or one of the Zotac boxes throw ubuntu and xbmc on it and call it a day. (alternatively you could also pickup a last gen AppleTV and install boxee/xbmc on it via thumbdrive)

Just because your using a oversized/overpowered device to run xbmc, does not mean that xbmc is not the right tool for the job :P

Comment Re:I actually like this trend... (Score 1) 833

Lets see 19.99 retail wow box Check
Free email account with one of the myriad providers.. check
Gamecards at any online or brick and mortar retailer check
OR
Disposable prepaid "gift card" from just about anywhere Check

BTW you also have never been required to have name on account match name on credit card for wow.. and the only way to actually PROVE that you are you would require not credit card matching but rather submitting your government issued ID card #.. which even blizzard is not likely to try to do.

Comment Re:I actually like this trend... (Score 1) 833

Completely false assumption, that is commonly made re internet behavior..

Anonymity by itself does *not* make people any more or less likely to post something.. its the person in question complete and utter lack of people skills.. IE yes they would say that sitting in church with mom.

Better still though is this scenario:

You refuse to participate in the "realid" forums.. but you have 30~ doppelgangers playing wow who all SHARE your real name..

So now some random basement dweller goes on a tirade about how much he or she wants to

Next day at work, your boss lets you know that you services are no longer required, and when you search for a new job, you cannot get past the "reference check" phase due to the extensive use of "googling real names" that is part of the recruitment process these days.

Now that we have that out of the way.. consider the following..

You have *never* had to have a REAL name to make a battle.net account , nor use a credit card for the account.. so for the low low price of buying wow retail box version @19.99$ you too can go on a posting spree in persona.

Now consider that due to the overlap in "real names" there is no real "community" around these realid names in terms of forums anyhow, since there are going to be duplicates for just about everyone..

What exactly does this system buy us? nothing.. what does it buy blizzard? A huge can of legal issues, and less stress on forum servers (at the start) go team?

Comment Re:how can you _boot_ into windows on hpfs+? (Score 3, Informative) 205

The point is that while it would allow them to isolate whether the *drive* itself in the macbook air is somehow immune to the issue, or if its something to do with the operating system/file system preventing the issue to occur.

IE if You do the tests in OS X, rezero the drive install windows xp/vista run them again (in NTFS on the mac's ssd), then finally install windows 7 also to a clean drive under NTFS and run the tests a final time (this last test would have trim enabled of course)

Chances are that what is happening is that the OS X has an artificial limit in speed (for whatever reason) masking the problem.. If that theory is correct then installing windows 7 to a freshly zero'd drive on the air, should result in significantly faster initial performance than measured under OS X, with a dropoff to roughly the levels measured under OS X over time.

Comment Re:While I agree that anonymity is a good thing... (Score 1) 780

Yes you are free to do that all, and you are free FROM the chances that the government will retaliate for your opinion...

The government will NOT protect you from the consequences to your business of telling your customers that you think they should all be deported back where they came from.. or a politician from saying that his supporters are all fools and that he is only in it for the cash/perks from lobbyists.

The fact that you are trying to equate the middle eastern dictators with the US over this.. shows that you should have spent more time in what? 5th? 6th grade social studies?

Comment Re:While I agree that anonymity is a good thing... (Score 1) 780

Do you really think there are packs of gay marriage/civil union supporters getting ready to roll out nationwide in an effort to vandalize and stalk bigoted politicians and business owners? Or are you more concerned of the negative press that an organized group could accomplish such as P.E.T.A or Greenpeace or any other group manages to generate?

As to your posting that you would never vote for gay marriage, thats sorta what we are all arguing about right? You are owning your position on the subject.. i presume you are not telling a bunch of people that are important to either your political power/financial success that you totally support them and agree that they should have X right.. while posting this on slashdot? Its not about the opinion, but the hypocritical nature of holding one position "publicly" and another when you think noone is looking.

Comment Re:While I agree that anonymity is a good thing... (Score 1) 780

No there is a difference between a ballot and a petition..

The american system was founded on principles and ideals, as well as taking responsibility for ones actions.. anonymity was never really considered.. especially given the context of the time in which the country was founded.. a person was only the sum of his reputation and his word.. this is precisely *WHY* The Declaration was signed by the men who wrote it *AND* those who agreed with it.. It was lending the power of their own reputations to that which they believed in.. Had they wanted to be meek and anonymous, they would simply have signed it "the people"

Not sure what you think is undercutting .. as this is precisely the sort of "disagreement" that happens every day in every city/state/town.. people will still "fight side by side" for what they DO agree on.. while disagreeing on other issues such as this one.

Comment Re:While I agree that anonymity is a good thing... (Score 1) 780

No its not.. perhaps you lost the fact that there is no expectation of "secretly adding your vote to the list" ala a random poll.. when you "publicly sign your name to a petition saying I SUPPORT THIS!"

EVERY petition in every state is legally public record by design, and intent of the medium (petition rather than poll).. just because this has not been tested in court previously does *not* mean that anyone had any expectation of privacy when standing in the middle of a mall signing their name and address in public, on a piece of paper where the next 50 people will be able to read the name and likely anyone at all while the stack of sheets are on the clipboard they picked up.

The fact that noone cared prior to this does not mean that there was ever an expectation of privacy when signing a petition.

Slashdot Top Deals

The moon is made of green cheese. -- John Heywood

Working...