Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Hydrophobic? (Score 2) 173

Him, you and all the people like you couldn't be more wrong. Science and mathematics has everything to do with the economic growth of the United States. How can the U.S. compete in biotechnology if what we learn in biology courses is that god created the beetle? How can we compete in oil production if all we learn is that fossils are there to fool the unbelievers and the earth is 6000 years old? Time and evolution created both: 4.54 billion years is a LONG time, animal species can change a lot over that amount of time.
 

I'm not even religious, but I'm pretty sure this post is trolling (if not 'just' idiotic).

Somehow religious people who buy into creationism are incapable of science and technology? What is the line of thinking.. "God created this creature, so I can't *possibly* bring myself to study how it works and duplicate it's function in novel technologies for mankind's use!" ?

Is the 11th commandment something like "You shall not look too closely at my other creations," or "You shall respect the privacy of all other creatures (but you can still eat them)" ?

And competing in fossil fuels..??? I think even the most devout church-goer knows that oil, coal, and natural gas are in the ground, and they can be quite useful if dug up or pumped out.

The same point applies to most other areas of technology and research, caveats being areas with moral concerns such as cloning and genetic manipulation. But even with those, there are legitimate non-religious reasons to be wary of progress with a lack of understanding the long term implications.

Slashdot Top Deals

And it should be the law: If you use the word `paradigm' without knowing what the dictionary says it means, you go to jail. No exceptions. -- David Jones

Working...