How many eugenics programs were based on scientific rigor or even half-assed logic?
Very few, if any... admittedly.
Historically speaking, however, that's how eugenics has been practiced when it has been applied to human beings. Off hand, historically, I can think of cases where they've tried to remove undesirable traits by executing people who had those traits were with homosexuals, believers in jesus, to the poor, to people who are left handed, and to even people who needed corrective lenses (I personally know someone who, during WW2, narrowly escaped being executed for that last reason).
So yeah... not very scientific.
But that still doesn't mean there's ever been a scientific study performed to conclude that it would work.
What does how many people there are have to with scalping? If they don't want to sell in China because there are too many people trying to order one in just that one country to both satisfy the demand there while meeting the demand anywhere else, then why don't they just say that instead of blaming it on people who are scalping dev kits?
One would assume that if scalping were a problem, limiting to one per customer would, as I said, make scalping prohibitively inconvenient... but all that you are saying is that they can't produce enough supply to meet the demand. They are two very different things, I trust that you realizes.
But you can't. The Republicans won't have you.
What...like they would supposedly go and tell them to vote for someone else?
"Engineering without management is art." -- Jeff Johnson