The thing is, the GPL relies on copyright to exist
Actually, GPL exists only as a counter to copyright. If there was no copyright, then GPL would not be necessary. This is circular reasoning.
Furthermore, copyright infringement is only "theft" if you believe in ownership/monopoly of ideas. So what we have here is really an ideological debate. It seems you have the establishments dick in you're mouth or you're just on a moral high horse because you pay for music like a good corporate slave or perhaps you're a poor struggling artist who just can't make a break peddling his imaginary wares. So perhaps slashdot is not the place for you.
data cannot be owned and the legal game of twister that's happened in order to try and allow it is sickening. it needs to go away.
I agree. This vague and abstract mess that is copyright, is all born out of the misguided concept that you can own ideas. Corporations want us to think they can, people know in their hearts that they can't.
People will buy anything that's one to a customer.