Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Amazing, and ironic (Score 1) 200

I may be wrong, but I think you're referring to the Intercept Modernisation Program or the "Snooping charter" here in the UK rather than Europe as a whole.

For a country that is apparently crippled with deficit, it's amazing that after having been abandoned by the previous Labour government, it's crept back in, sneekily being announced by the Tories in the spending review a couple of weeks ago. Bear in mind that one of the reasons the previous government abandoned it because it was likely to cost far more than the original £2 billion estimate.

Comment I found mine on Gumtree! (Score 1) 162

Seriously... it's amazing what you can find on there. We met up, got on, had similar interests and the rest is history. So just keep on looking, and make sure you meet your mentor/supervisor and see if you click. If you don't, forget about doing a PhD with them - you need all the help you can get.
It's funny.  Laugh.

Submission + - Wi-Fi Allergy a PR Stunt

ADiamond writes: There is no Wi-Fi allergy. The English DJ claiming a Wi-Fi sensitivity chronicled in Slashdot recently, was a PR stunt to promote his new album. It would appear that the stunt was highly successful, appearing in multiple high-profile media outlets like The Sun, The Telegraph, and Fox News. The article at Ars goes on to discuss the evidence, or lack-thereof, of electromagnetic spectrum sensitivity. Apparently, these publications don't bother to verify their sources. A cursory look into the 2% statistic would have yielded no backing data.
It's funny.  Laugh.

Submission + - 10 Worst Evolutionary Designs (wired.com)

JamJam writes: Besides my beer gut, which I'm sure has some purpose, Wired is running a story on the 10 Worst Evolutionary Designs. Ranging from baby giraffes being dropped 5-foot during birth to Goliath bird-eating spiders that practically explode when they fall from trees.

Comment Dead or alive... (Score 2, Insightful) 244

I was under the impression that for any serious application of a biometric (as in "for security reasons"), that the system should check that the subject is alive, to help deter people from chopping off fingers or poking out eyes. eg a fingerprint scanner would check for sub-surface bloodflow.

The fact that this system is fooled by a static image of the person therefore deems it not fit for purpose IMHO, and this finding should be gratefully received by the manufacturers who can now work on improving the system.

Slashdot Top Deals

If you want to put yourself on the map, publish your own map.

Working...