phantomfive wrote: "we have Republicans who say, 'government is too big, we need to either cut it or cut its budget'"
You didn't put enough emphasis on the word SAY. Republicans **say** government is too big, but what they mean is: give some of that money to our interest groups (defense, fossil fuel, financial, health insurance, etc. companies). I'm not defending Democratic spending--I'm just saying at least they don't lie about it.
Look it up: spending under Republican presidents Reagan, Bush1, and Bush2 all went way up.
Reagan - 80% increase
Bush1 - 30% increase
Bush2 - 67% increase
source: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2010/assets/hist.pdf
tjarrett wrote: "We acknowledge the inherent selection bias (the applications in the report come from our customers) in the methodology section."
It's good of him to point that out, but that's not the only flaw in the study I'm sure. First of all it was done by someone with a stake in the outcome, which is always problematic, even with the purest of intentions.
Second, the article says "[t]he vulnerability with the highest total count was cross-site scripting (XSS), and was the third most prevalent flaw."
In my experience that's usually an artifact of the application server and the test tool--not the code. Out of the box most app servers error pages echo back arguments like parameter=evil_script. The tool says that's XSS. The vendors like BEA, Sun, Oracle don't seem to agree, although they'll send you a patch if you beg.
I wonder whether Veracode actually validated that the "vulnerabilities" were actually exploitable.
Obama refuses to use markup "...to associate data cells and header cells for data tables that have two or more logical levels of row or column headers. "
Impeach him!
FACT: NSF did implement a site filtering tool (Blue Coat WebFilter) in 2008. This story is old news, the employees involved were fired or disciplined.
The Washington Times is just exploiting this for sensationalism and political points.
The pontiff complained, âoeA new mentality is creeping in that tends to justify a different consideration of life and personal dignity.â
But what he was thinking was: I wonder if we can get hotter-looking Catholics this way? Cuz the ones around here...
Without Majel Barrett, there can never be another Star Trek movie or show. It is forbidden.
"The following is not for the weak of heart or Fundamentalists." -- Dave Barry