Comment Re:Wrong target! (Score 1) 642
maybe the true answer is that there aren't actually enough terrorists to be worth worrying about, hmmm??
More than that
maybe the true answer is that there aren't actually enough terrorists to be worth worrying about, hmmm??
More than that
I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization.
I find your sig quite ironic in this context.
and NOTHING I would want yet.
FTFY, given that web apps can perform any task that native apps can perform
web apps just aren’t always going to do the job.
What's stopping them?
The only thing I can think of is cross-site scripting restrictions, but there are workarounds for that
I haven't met one person who actually said they want internet censorship in Australia.
I haven't had the same experience unfortunately. Most of my non-technical friends actually support it, due to "omg those pedophiles must be stopped!" mentality.
Why can't people think rationally as soon as children become involved?
I don't want to turn on Sponge Bob at 2pm and see Sandy with a strap on fucking Patrick up the Ass while Squidward cums on his face.
So don't watch channels that do that! How do so many people not understand that just because something exists doesn't imply that you'll be forced to see it!
Seriously, there are a LOT of adults with young kids in the world. There is a very large demand for kid-friendly material, and that demand will be met! Stop fucking worrying about the evil porn monster jumping out and randomly slapping your kids in the face - any channel that did that would never get another viewer or ad dollar ever again!
There *are* those kids who don't understand sarcasm, don't follow even the most basic logical arguments and may not understand that discussing terrorism does not imply becoming a terrorist. Slashdot posters who breezed through high school should understand that many people barely passed (hell, many people fail).
So because some people don't/can't understand it, the argument has merit? I'd hope we were going for a higher level of reasoning than lowest-common denominator consensus.
To be honest, most of the gamers in that mindset are moving to the consoles, and I really don't have a problem with that. I have been enjoying the recent round of indy-style games immensely, and hope the trend continue.
Some of my favourite, non-graphically intense recent games:
For 3d games, Half-Life 2's Source engine is the sweet spot. From then on, graphics have been good enough, and what makes a game "good" is the gameplay.
I understand, but isn't it just easier to just get rid of the damned refused classification all together?
Well
I'm more pissed off at our government and society than pretty much anyone I know, yet where could I move? Every country seems to be fucked in their own special way
I believe the idea of an R18+ rating is that everything which is now considered "Refused Classification" just becomes "R18+"
One effect of not having an R18+ rating means that there is immense pressure on the classification board to be very liberal with the 15+ rating, as companies spend millions of dollars making these games. This actually increases the chance of young kids seeing inappropriate content!
Living on Earth may be expensive, but it includes an annual free trip around the Sun.