Comment Re:What's the difference between China and EU? (Score 2) 222
so you're ok with child porn and death threats?
What part of my position is not clear? Yes.
i stopped reading there. you're a hopeless moron
so you're ok with child porn and death threats?
What part of my position is not clear? Yes.
i stopped reading there. you're a hopeless moron
seizure in the usa is already way out of control
the recent federal review of asset seizure laws is welcome, but weak:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...
worrying about banks seizing funds is the least of your problems
call it zuckerbucks
it's for zuckers
so you're ok with child porn and death threats?
can i take photos of you having sex with your significant other and put it on a billboard in your hometown? it's just free speech dude
everything has limits. including free speech. not because i say so, but because of simple logic and reason: it ends where it impinges on the freedoms of others. classic example: yelling fire in a crowded theatre
the fact that i recognize that freedoms are not boundless, but logically constrained by other people's freedoms, does not make me an authoritarian, it just makes me smarter than you
go to google news
type in "shooting"
and let's dip into the ocean today
http://www.newsday.com/news/ne...
http://www.post-gazette.com/lo...
http://www.ketv.com/news/omaha...
http://www.twincities.com/crim...
http://miami.cbslocal.com/2015...
http://www.whsv.com/home/headl...
etc.
etc.
tomorrow it will be another collection of dozens of shootings
every fucking day in the usa. oh it happens in other countries. at a much lower rate. because they make guns harder for douchebags to get
the usa enjoys no amazing lower rate of rape, robbery, assault, etc., because of owning lots of guns, as compared to our social and economic peers, we are no crime free paradise. so owning a gun doesn't confer magic anti-crime properties. it does confer something though: a massive increase in homicide. pointlessly. needlessly. every little confusion or altercation in the usa has to lead to death. and this is somehow better
completely unnecessary, completely fucking stupid, and completely ok according to my fellow countrymen who are fucking braindead douchebags
we need gun control in the usa badly
and we are going to get it
you can't ward off logic and common sense with stupidity, lies, and propaganda forever
if i read something, i expect it to have a fucking point. your post, for example, has a point. but if it's a meandering brain diarrhea dump, i'm going to complain. i don't have the right to do that?
in London, you get in a fight and you get a broken arm or a broken nose
in New York City, you get in a fight and you get a body bag
whenever the homicide rate of the USA is compared to other Western countries, NRA propagandized morons change the subject and counter about *violence*. as if *violence* is the same as *homicide*
frankly, i'd love the violence rate in the usa to go up and the homicide rate to go down. because a broken arm is not a body bag
and you get that with better gun control
but too many of my fellow americans of the low iq and propagandized variety believe for some fucking ignorant reason that every little misunderstanding or conflict has to escalate to death
and that's exactly what we get:
http://www.conferenceboard.ca/...
rape? robbery? violence? about the same as our social and economic peers
easy guns do not protect us from those things. they just mean tens of thousands of extra body bags every year
if anything, owning a gun increases the chance of mortality for you and your loved ones, because you've raised the stakes in every little act of confusion/ misunderstanding/ anger/ accident/ etc. to death
like what? child porn? incitement to murder? sure. i live in the West and i support suppression of that
like political criticism? religious satire? no. i do not support that
the country that limits a few vicious topics is not at all like the country that locks down all political speech threatening the political status quo
the former is very much a free country, the latter very much not a free country, and the difference is substantive and real and very serious
if you think a country that censors child porn is exactly the same as one that censors political speech, you're only announcing yourself as a moron who doesn't understand the topic
no, ask most english speakers what 50 cents means and they think Curtis James Jackson III born July 6, 1975
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5...
you really do have to spread the word about astroturfers paid by the chinese government to vomit propaganda on social media, most english speakers really are not aware of them
you've listed a bunch of red herrings, tangential topics, and pointless observations to say nothing valid or interesting at all on the topic
it's as if you lack the capacity for critical thought... or you are demonstrating a weak timid mind taught that to approach certain taboo topics and verboten observations leads to punishment
hmmm...
so here we see the mediocre fruitless mental quality of someone raised in a walled garden of a "harmonious" society of cotton headed propaganda tools
so you're saying that criticism of the chinese government is ok, as long the chinese government approves the criticism
do you even listen to yourself? how propagandized and/ or braindead do you have to be to not see how stupid that sounds?
If you don't notice a flashing green light barely in your peripheral vision I would start to wonder if you ought to be driving at all.
At my height, the steering wheel blocks out half the dashboard. And, no, I can't fix this problem with a phone book (even if such a thing was still available).
My problem is that I'm forced to recline to a halfway recumbent position to keep from mashing my head into the ceiling.
In many vehicles I end up reclined so far back that I can barely reach the steering wheel. And, no, this is not because I have short arms. It's because the rear passenger window has now entered my peripheral vision. If this strikes you as strange, then I suspect it's been a long while since you spent any quality time with sin/cosine. (I have a wine bottle a mere 2" too tall for one of my cupboard shelves. If I tilt it to 45 degrees it fits just fine.)
So then I have to crank the seat forward until my knees are striking the front dashboard. Strangely, I don't find this uncomfortable for my legs, unless I wish to move them.
My peripheral vision is now roughly oriented toward the driver's seat-belt pulley, and my eye level is horizontal to the tint line on the windscreen. By the time I get the steering adjusted to a comfortable position, it's almost a certainty that half the dashboard is occluded by the top half of the steering wheel.
I can't see stop lights, either, if I'm first to the light and I've pulled up to the stop line, unless I use the old ear-to-shoulder trick—or I spot some other aspect of the intersection control synchronized to the light I'm waiting on.
What look like large vehicles from the outside are usually just as bad. Sure, the cabin height is increased, but usually they take most of it away with a higher seat height (to better accommodate all those fancy seat motors whose very existence makes the seating position you most desire impossible to achieve).
You should book a week sometime in the Hobbit Hotel. It will do wonders for your imagination concerning the circumstances that others face. Probably you should do this before participating in the design of any mechanical thing to be used by anyone other than a jet fighter pilot (whose physiques are carefully restricted to the design environment).
Actions sometimes send messages, but they are not speech.
Non-verbal actions are not speech (excepting deaf people and Italians and anyone with secure tenure in hard rock D-block and postural nuance of a clever hostage being photographed by his or her kidnapper), but often they are speech acts (in cases too far multitudinous to list here).
Like they dumped CE
As well NT for the PowerPC and NT for the Alpha.
In short Windows isn't successful unless it is compatible with the decades of legacy stuff.
The reason why we are not all on 64bit windows is because we still may have some 16bit windows 3.1 apps that we cannot replace.
When Microsoft dominated they pushed developers towards non-cross platform development... So now they are forced to deal with back-assward compatibility.
An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says 'Beam me up, Scotty'.