*sigh*
Once again, from the top:
1) Syntax, grammar, and spelling are intended to assist communication. Nothing more. "Readability" is a metric of the effectiveness of the communication.
2) Misuse of those rules to provide a service they are not, and have never been intended for (conveying how "smart", or how "valuable" the communication itself is) is not rational.
3) Drawing attention to incorrect use, as an excuse to ignore communication you find disfavorable, is pure hypocrisy. The reason it is hypocrisy, is because the premise itself relies on misuse of those rules; specifically, the attempt to use them as a metric of worthiness to communicate. Those rules are not and have never been intended for that function. Calling out misuse for the purpose of misuse is nonsensical.
4) As stated in the addendum post, I use a smartphone with a crappy IME. When coupled with the notoriously bad "slashdot mobile" experience, entire words are simply omitted during text entry, *despite being keyed*, and further, any attempts at proofreading and correction are rendered extraordinarily difficult to accomplish. Under these circumstances, "perfect communication" is not possible, without hurculean effort.
Taken all together, your insistence and arrogance on the demand clearly demonstrates several outstanding features.
1) You are unwilling to finish reading something that does not meet your onerous preconceptions of value.
2) You hypocritically misuse language rules while condemning others for a related infraction.
3) You have clearly demonstrated your own lack of tolerance in intellectual matters, giving a REAL metric of your own intellectual capacities.
4) You have clearly demonstrated that you are unable to approach the situation without subjective biases, and that you will cling to strawmen rather than actually "degrade yourself" to actually finish reading what was written.
5) You resort to adhominems and other illogical tactics when called on the above.
From this, I can only conclude that you are not nearly as intelligent and well educated as you believe yourself to be, and live in a carefully constructed fantasy setting in which you and you alone are worthy of communication, and that *any* deviation from the currently established norms for the language used, is clear evidence to support this self-narrative.
In light of that:
Which is correct: Jail, or Gaol.
After you experience that sudden burst of anger and incredulity, I challenge you to look it up.
You will find that the latter is archaic, but correct. How then did it become "jail" instead?
The simple answer, is that your preconception about "propriety" of language, and of its syntax, and use all having an ultimately and unquestionably "correct" form, simply is not conserved. It is a fantasy. One you cling desperately to, and that desperation with which you cling to it, speaks volumes about how uneducated and unintelligent you actually are.