Mickey Mouse will never enter the public domain. Disney will always get a retroactive extension to copyright that includes it through congress before that happens. You can argue that this is bad/unfair/unconstitutional/great/etc but that is the practical reality. Any practical proposal for a reform of the copyright system has to take this into account.

Under the current system this means that anything from that era forward also stays out of the public domain forever, including “orphan works”. The loss of these “orphan works” that are long out of print and with no clear owner is the one thing that (almost) everyone can agree is a Bad Thing. So, any reform that has any chance of passing must improve the situation with those items while preserving the interests of politically powerful copyright holders (Disney, Sony, etc). I can see some options that could do it, though in any real world implementations would reveal some flaws.

Opt-in renewal is the one we hear tossed around the most. This sets forgotten material into the public domain but preserves the copyright on anything the owner finds worthy of a nominal renewal fee. It has the added bonus of registering who you can license the publishing rights from.

Letting works fall into the public domain after being out of print for X years could also accomplish the above goals. It would also have the added bonus of encouraging publishers to keep a work available/in-print to preserve their rights.

Lastly we could instead create a special extension for trademarks, franchises, and corporate identifiers. Things strongly associated with an ongoing business could be protected for a longer period. DC would keep Superman and Disney would keep Mickey, but an out of print science article would not get the new extension and would eventually enter the public domain.

None of these proposals would satisfy copyleft purists or “hands off my copyright!” paranoids but they could be a reasonable starting point for compromise.

I lived through a cricket plague as a kid on a farm in rurral CA (different species). One morning I looked out the window and the lawn was black... and moving. They came into the house through every crack and crevice. The road was carpeted with them to the point that the school threatened to stop sending the bus. They showed up en mass a couple of other years but never again that bad.

A side note: I guess that LZ and the Stones now qualify as Weapons Grade Music.

Here is what I have been able to glean from various articles:

It requres that games disply age ratings. Of course all comercialy available games already display an ESRB rating so nothing changes there.

New consoles must have parental lockouts. Of course all consoles already have lockouts, and have done so for years. So no benifit there.

Establishes a comission to evaluate (suposed) links between real world violence and playing Missle Command. [sarcasm] I am sure that we can trust that the conclusions from a politicaly created body will be far more objective and fact based that academic studies.[/sarcasm]

All in all this has the smell of election year posturing. It was sped through at the end of a legislative session, so that the sponsors could claim to voters that they voted to "protect the children." In reality it will do nothing for NY other than sticking the tax payers with a big legal bill defending against costitutional challanges.

It is an atempt to convince voters that crime is not related to lawmakers failures to handle law enforcement, economics or eduction. It was Mario who stole your hubcaps.