Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Push vs. Pull (Score 1) 363

Yes if only there were some sort of Rich Site Summary that could be published by websites

I have many times subscribed to website newsletters and RSS feeds, but as the parent stated, I usually say "eh, I'll read that later" and often times never get around to it. Since it is digital, and takes up an insignificant space on my computer or gmail account, I don't care if it goes unread. With printed magazines, I see it sitting on the table every time I walk by, and am constantly asked by my wife to read the magazine so she can throw it out, so I tend to read them sooner. I also like to read them while taking my daily #2, and to me, reading a tablet while on the john just seems wrong.

Comment Re:After the first $million ... (Score 1) 268

What I would like to know, is are they going to provide their users with 10 Gigabit hardware (and limit to 2 Gbps), or are they going to run two 1 Gbps fibers and do load sharing, or are they going to give them an OC-48 (2.48 Gbps), because there is no current technology that can do just 2Gbps.

Comment Re:Moves and countermoves. (Score 2, Interesting) 198

The majority of all spam comes from home computers infected with a worm that makes it part of a botnet. The fact that some mail servers can slow down the sending of mail is not the solution. If ISPs were to block all SMTP connections from their DSL/cable customers, that would put a huge dent in the amount of spam. Most people get their email through some sort of webmail based system so there is really no need for people to be sending legitimate emails via SMTP. And for the ones that like to have their Thunderbird or Outlook express send their email, there is probably a way that you can make the client get the email through the web system the same as the way Outlook can be retrieved over SSL. Block users from sending SMTP and you block most of the spam on the Internet.

Comment Re:Agree about GMail... (Score 5, Insightful) 198

If you read Bill Gates' original prediction, he said that spam would be killed through the electronic equivalent of a stamp, also known as "payment at risk". This means that if an email gets marked as spam, then the sender will be billed for a cost whenever they send a spam email. He didn't say that users would not have to deal with spam, he said that spam would simply not exist altogether. This most certainly did not happen, so he was completely wrong in his prediction.

Comment Re:Cold beer (Score 1) 217

don't you start to lose energy if you leave the bottles in there, because now the fridge has to cool those thawed bottles as well now?

As he said, once they thaw you put them back outside to freeze again. But even if you didn't, it would actually still be ok to leave them in since a refrigerator is more efficient with more things inside than with less. This is because there is less air that needs to be cooled when the door is opened and all the cold air escapes.

Comment Re:and (Score 1) 412

As long as the free whores are written into a contract that we both agree to, then yes I'll buy your house. Don't complain when the company adheres to the legal agreement that you agreed to (and supposedly read) when you signed up for the service.

Comment Re:Yeah, there are (Score 1) 412

None of the other utilities you mentioned promise unlimited access anyway.

I don't think he was talking about being able to get as much water as you want for the same price, but the amount of water that is available at any one time. If every single household in a neighborhood turned on all their water faucets at the same time, there would not be enough water for them all. That is oversubscription.

Comment Re:bigger problem is SPEAKEASY ARE LIARS (Score 1) 412

Even though you said you did, apparently you did not read their terms of service...

3.1 Bandwidth: As an ISP, Speakeasy's financial liability is partially determined by the amount of bandwidth customers utilize. Speakeasy can normally balance that cost and utilization while continuing to provide great service to all customers. Customers will not be charged for the bandwidth consumed, nor does Speakeasy have specific limits or caps on that bandwidth. However, if Customer utilizes any of Customer's Speakeasy services in a manner that consumes excessive bandwidth or otherwise negatively affects Speakeasy's core equipment, overall network performance, or other users' services, Speakeasy may require that Customer cease or alter these activities.

They were perfectly legal in asking you to stop your high usage because you agreed to that TOS.

Comment Re:These people deserved to be crushed by WoW (Score 1) 173

Not if that armor is available to everyone. Then it is meaningless because the game rebalances.

It's available to everyone willing to pay additional money for the armor. If I don't want to pay more money than the monthly subscription, then I am not able to get the better gear, and am at a disadvantage.

Slashdot Top Deals

Today is a good day for information-gathering. Read someone else's mail file.

Working...