Actually, the NSA cracked the first 3 of the 4 coded messages themselves, but didn't go public with it until a member of the public had found the solution. Or they claim they did, anyway . . .

Well, all those jail cells aren't just going to fill themselves up, are they?

It's pretty easy to verify what speech on Wikipedia is accurate. All information should be verifiable by checking a reliable source. If you find information in Wikipedia where no source is given and you think it may be incorrect, put in a [citation needed] tag. If no one adds a citation, anyone is free to remove the information.

Of course, many people who bitch about Wikipedia and how it doesn't work complain that their edits were undone, often because they added information without a reliable source for verification. You can't please everyone. Either you set a bar to clear to get your edits in and people complain that their edits are undone, or you let everyone add anything and people complain that too much information is inaccurate.

So CO2 doesn't acidify the oceans?

The flaw lies in an API that is specifically designed to help prevent against SQL injection attacks.

You had one job!

I've used the Speakeasy Speed Test in the past. I'm currently on a T1 connection and just got a reading of 1.5 Mbps upload and download speed, which is right on the money.

I don't know about you, but when I boil water, I bring it to a boil, to nearly 100 degrees Celsius. I don't let it all evaporate away!

Yes, people breathing creates carbon dioxide and plants use it. But you know digging up fossil fuels and burning them creates GREENHOUSE GASSES that cause WARMING, don't you?

Nice strawman. It's not about "the world ending" or "higher taxes" or "world government" at all. I don't know how you people twist a bit of warming into crap like that. We're burning fossil fuels, creating carbon dioxide, which is a greenhouse gas, and it's causing warmer temperatures. Those warmer temperatures will cause economic losses, so to cut our losses we should cut carbon dioxide emissions by generating electricity from non-fossil fuel sources.

I shall have you know, sir, that there is no such unit as a cubic story. The proper term is cubic story squared! Good day, sir!

I think he converted 40 square meters to 47 square yards, which is fairly reasonable. But then he really goofed and called it 47 yards square, which is something completely different altogether -- something that is a square with 47 yards per side!

3 editors, but they spend only 12 editor-seconds per story.

Increasing food production increases the girth of the people in the middle. FTFY

Isn't that a problem with all energy sources? Speaking more realistically, fossil fuels will run out in hundreds of years and solar will last billions. Which would you bet the future on?