Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment No big deal. . ."most people" will use whatever is (Score 1) 276

hooked up to the most convenient "search" box. I apple just puts in a mildly similar looking set of search results, and a colorful 'apppppple' logo above the page numbers, most people won't give it a second thought. Sure, slashdotters would notice, but Ma and Pa and the 90 percent of the population that is not the least bit techy could care less. They're just interested in the stuff they find in the sites that are found, not in who provides the search. I think it is kind of silly for Apple to go on giving all of that money away to Google every year. They could be making a fortune off of the advertising in their own search instead of giving it away to Google. Getting back to "most people", I think they will also continue to call it "googling" eventhough they are typing their search into an Apple search box. (just like we used to say "go make a xerox of this on the Kodak machine" when I worked at Kodak a million years ago -- though that was just for fun -- come to think of it, does Kodak still make copiers?)

Comment Nobody has welcomed our environmental overlords... (Score 1) 865

All your freedom are belong to us. . . In reality, it is already too late to "fix" this by changing the slope of the curve with governmental restrictions on amount/types of energy use. The only viable solution, and the most likely to happen, is some form of Geoengineering. At some point, some large country, acting in its own self interest (or in the interest of a well-monied lobbyist) will unilaterally enact a Geoengineering "solution". This will mostly likely outrage and inconvenience some other country (or lobbyist or large company with internal resources capable of Geoengineering), setting off a chain reaction of competing attempts at geoengineering. The only viable solution to the coming geoengineering crisis is to put democracy on hold. . .

Comment Re:groundwater means water IN the ground... (Score 1) 93

Having just committed the ultimate /. sin, I read the company info after posting. TFA erroneously combined the properties of two different products from the company with similar names. The product that is used on groundwater is intended only to grab and hold harmless the bad stuff, not for removing it from the ground.

Comment groundwater means water IN the ground... (Score 1) 93

groundwater |groundwôtr; -wätr| noun water held underground in the soil or in pores and crevices in rock. Me thinks this is a bogus article about a bogus "invention" by a bogus company. Water ON the ground is sometimes called "a flood", and sometimes called "a lake", depending upon whether or not the condition is chronic.

Comment Art vs. Construction (Score 1) 477

The proponents of the two sides of this "argument" seem to me to be artists and constructionists. In software, art is what happens at a hacker conference or at a startup BEFORE the investors start poking around. Construction (including architecture and source control and coding standards and design patterns et. al.) is what happens at a medium to large company that takes huge amounts of skilled workers to build something that can then be charged for in copious amounts and which will then make investors rich. In short, hacking vs. coding. Both have a place in the world. Neither should be influenced by the other. The big problem with software is that the former usually morphs into the later rather than being a completely separate effort which should include none of the original source material and none of the original players. And finally, a good hacker is NEVER a good coder, and a bad coder is often NOT a gifted hacker, but someone who shouldn't be doing either type of work.

Slashdot Top Deals

An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says 'Beam me up, Scotty'.

Working...