So, the Australian parliament has WASTED weeks on a "Return [former PM Kevin] Rudd" & it -almost- began a similar "Dump Julia [Gillard]" campaign recently.
Question time Q&A's are broadcast in ABC "News" Radio, and often shows the idiocy of personal attacks & insults that Elected Members can get up to...
All this useless time-wasting means AU's parliament gets stuck "cycling on the negative" while other, more intelligent legislatures move their countries -ahead- of Australia, despite its potential to lead & succeed.
WHAT AU NEEDS is Direct Digital Democracy, eg, in the form of FEEDBACK to the Speaker (who can stop proceedings, name Members who are deemed to be playing-up, & even -eject- Members who ignore his/her instructions to cease misbehaving.
Suppose it were possible for a random & changing collection of Citizens (in statistically significant numbers) - who are monitoring (in Real Time), from anywhere across Australia - to indicate their Satisfaction or Dissatisfaction with the proceedings at the moment, ie, in the House and/or Senate, and BE HEARD (electronically) and EFFECTIVELY STOP / CHANGE those proceedings.
So, if a random sampling of current (in real time) listeners and/or viewers of those proceedings could Press either a YES or a NO button, to register or withhold, resp., their support for what how their Elected Members are -currently- (at that moment, + or - say 5 - 15 min's) using their time...
and a TALLY-based RESULT (CONTINUE or STOP) indicator was presented to the Speaker of House & Senate... the Speaker could - moments after getting that
RESULT indicator - rule to STOP (eg, & move on to a next item, that might use that house's time better) or ALLOW the current proceedings to continue.
The idea is that - today - the Public can only grow angrier... but has No Agenda or Unit-of-Proceeding level way to indicate what they like or dislike, akin to a Presidential "Line-Item Veto" power.
This proposal would give the Public a feedback control power, not quite as rich as Citizen Initiated Referendum (CIR) power enjoyed by more democratically-wealthy Swiss, but perhaps "safer"... until we can competently handle the responsibility of CIR power. Perhaps this Speaker Feedback mechanism would help the Public learn to handle power, so that - some years after having & exercising it - they'll be ready to take-on CIR powers. :-)
My 2.2 cents.