Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Why? (Score 3, Informative) 540

OpenDNS doesn't follow the DNS standards, whereas Google's DNS does. From Wikipedia:

While the OpenDNS name resolution service is free, people have complained about how the service handles failed requests. If a domain cannot be found, the service redirects you to a search page with search results and advertising provided by Yahoo!. A DNS user can switch this off via the OpenDNS Control Panel but will lose content filtering ability. This behavior is similar to that of many large ISP's who also redirect failed requests to their own servers containing advertising. [12]

In 2007, David Ulevitch explained that in response to Dell installing "Browser Address Error Redirector" software on their PCs, OpenDNS started resolving requests to Google.com. Some of the traffic is handled by OpenDNS typo-correcting service which corrects mistyped addresses and redirects keyword addresses to OpenDNS's search page, while the rest is transparently passed through to the intended recipient.[13]

Also, a user's search request from the address bar of a browser that is configured to use the Google search engine (with a certain parameter configured) may be covertly redirected to a server owned by OpenDNS without the user's consent (but within the OpenDNS Terms of Service).[14] Users can disable this behavior by logging in to their OpenDNS account and unchecking "OpenDNS proxy" option.[15] Additionally, Mozilla users can fix this problem by installing an extension[16] or by simply changing or removing the navclient sourceid from their keyword search URLs.

This redirection breaks some non-web applications which rely on getting an NXDOMAIN for non-existent domains, such as e-mail spam filtering, or VPN access where the private network's nameservers are consulted only when the public ones fail to resolve.

Comment Re:It Hurts (Score 1) 320

Sorry, 'world wide flood' was a very bad choice of words. I didn't mean to suggest there actually was some armageddon type flood, but rather a very specific rise in the world's water levels caused disproportionately large floods at a relatively specific time in history.

Comment Re:It Hurts (Score 1) 320

Are you kidding? The flood is the one part of the Bible I do find interesting. While surely not at the same time they list in the Bible (determined by tracing back the lineage), there are many, many corroborating sources on a flood.

Looking at various early creation myths, we see flood myths mentioned almost universally. While some are no doubt local floods that caused a minor inconvenience (but enough to write down) there are many that employ the 'and so were our people wiped out, except for a few saved'.

Off the top of my head: Babylon, Sumer, Greece, Rome, Hebrew, Assyrian, Celtic, Cherokee (Great Lakes area), Pomo (California), China (22 year flood), Inuit (Alaska)...

I'm probably forgetting a lot, but the idea is that Yes, there was probably a major world wide flood at some point in prehistory. It was probably around the end of the last glacial period (about 10,000 years ago). The time scale is skewed in myth because no one keeps track of time on the 500+ year scale. Things become 'in my grandfather's grandfather's grandfather's time'.

Comment Re:Instant-On Smartphones? (Score 1) 324

You know what there is a market for? Touch screen Netbooks. The iPhone has brushed against that market but is still too smart phone-ey to really dominate it. It's too small. The Kindle is closer in some ways but can't handle the real computing even a basic Netbook could do. As soon as there is a real, viable touch screen netbook for !outrageous prices, that will be the Next Big Thing (tm).

Comment Instant-On Smartphones? (Score 2, Informative) 324

Droid gives you more features and more convenience - plus you don't have to take 7 seconds to boot.

I'll admit I don't have a Droid - I have the G1 - but a 7 second boot would be far superior to what I experience.

What are people talking about with 'instant on smartphones'? The only thing 'instant-on' that I've seen is turning the screen back on. If you ever have to actually reboot the thing it takes at a least a MINUTE (haven't timed it, could be longer).

Slashdot Top Deals

And it should be the law: If you use the word `paradigm' without knowing what the dictionary says it means, you go to jail. No exceptions. -- David Jones

Working...