Actually, he was wearing his seatbelt, and it snapped. After which he was flung from the car before it smashed into a tree. Additionally, it happened while he was in high school, so it would have effected our ability to have ep4-6 as well...and I will any day of the week gladly accept ep1-3 if the alternative is no ep4-6 either.

The problem isnt suppressing people from talking about negative side effects, it's that they need to be suppressed from doing it "like this". Legally, as an employee of a pharmaceutically company, I am required to report when I hear by any means of a side-effect, defect, or off-label use of one of the products manufactured by my company. The company would prefer these complaints to be filtered by doctors, not come directly from consumers. We need to spend our time investigating "My patient used drug X while taking acetominophen, and experienced heart murmurs." not "I took drug drug X and now my leg hurts real bad. (but I didnt tell you about when I fucked my leg up playing softball last weekend)." I can easily imagine many people going "My doctor told me it was all the hamburgers I eat causing my heart pain...but I think it's the anti-excema meds I take...Im going to complain on Facebook because people need to know!" Then the company ends up having to investigate a baseless claim, and improper information gets disseminated via the internet because people wil believe anyone that says "Big Pharma doesnt want you to know!"

The same way that fingerprints are.

"... no more suspicion that you are guilty of a crime than he would be suspicious of any other random person." I wasn't aware that "random" was the criteria for making felony arrests.

So you voluntarily give your fingerprints then?

There is absolutely no assumption of guilt involved with this. Your fingerprints, your properties, your vehicles...all these exist in databases which the polica already search through without any assumption of your guilt or innocence. This is no different. Go bitch about those databases if you're going to bitch about this one. There is nothing to fear in having your DNA on file unless you have something to fear already.

What happens when there's an amber alert? Shit! The police search through car registrations for a match. I'm being searched without suspicion!

My vehicle's license plate number, make, model, color is being searched for a match every time there is a traffic violation or an amber alert. Should I bitch that my registration should not be on record to avoid suspicionless search?

...and the problem with having your DNA in a database is? Well, aside from the "if you ever do commit a crim you'll be easier to catch" aspect.

So then how do you get arrested for a felony without being suspected of anything?

"“What the DNA Act authorizes is the warrantless and suspicionless search of individuals..." A felony is commited. I find someone I think might do it. Let's call them a...suspect. I arrest this suspect. Now you're saying it's suspicionless for me to take a DNA sample?

Informative?? I think not.

Knowing what the API is != Knowing what the drug product is