Quick glance at the charts over at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_of_Chile leaves me completely unimpressed

Next thing you'll say is that it's good to send people to war because it generates many limbless research subjects.
The reason why military is producing results is because it's being funded. But research is still just its byproduct.
A dedicated civilian team working to solve these problems can only yield better results.
On a semi-related note: Prosthetics are too expensive.

I don't understand this joke.

This has nothing to do with Middle Ages.

How we got to lack of "pre-judgement" as a factor of excellence I'll never know. I appreciate non-conformity more than most, but that hardly accounts for insight.

This differs from cookie-based authentication only in that it is standardized.

This is different from cookie-based authentication only in that it would be standardized.

Bugger ye off a wee bit, won't you laddie?

You're going to LOVE this: There's this guy who's making a clone of rails in PHP. It's called phails, and has its own rake called phake. Guess what they're both written in? Bash. I'm not even kidding. Because I'm that guy.

I was just going to ask for his source.

You do realize, that what they currently have *is* the two state solution, right? They just don't recognize each-other.
I can tell you from what I've seen separation will never bring peace. It may reduce fire to smoldering to build giant walls, but smolder will not cease.
I think they'll have to find a way to live with each-other instead.

You're talking about me, and not the other man. You can treat the other man as you wish, but treat *me* well!

Actually, your math is wrong - it's worse than that. You'd actually need 150% more (that is, 2.5 times as much) renewable resources to pack the same amount of energy using a 20% efficient fuel production process as you would with a 50% efficient battery production process. However, this may improve, do not dismiss renewable fuel production just yet. The main advantage to fuel is that it can store more energy in an equivalent amount of space compared to batteries. But neither this, nor the overlooked issue of what is worse for the environment (chemicals from dead cells, or unrecoverable byproduct gasses) is as important as the fact that the amount of carbon dioxide in air is not inexhaustible either. That's right, one could imagine, given the increased demand, the exact opposite of today's situation happening: Killing nature by *reducing* CO2.

Analysis of your post: Misunderstanding of Russian outlook on manhood, misunderstanding of the social situation there and how wealth is relative, obvious lack of paranoia, a really good car and a friend in the background (http://krebsonsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/vorvnsdyt.png).

If this was a honeypot post, you got me. I am bound to be a criminal, book me, Sigmund Holmes from Precrime.

If only I were a stupid uneducated rich boy in either my teens, or at least 30s watching TV instead of hacking, and not caring about social justice. Maybe I would start on the good path then. -_-