Comment Re:State of fear (Score 1) 1100
except it's a bit reversed: businesses are the ones suing
Mr Crichton's points in that book are still pretty much valid, though.
except it's a bit reversed: businesses are the ones suing
Mr Crichton's points in that book are still pretty much valid, though.
this is (slowly) changing, as more and more people can afford high quality cameras and lenses; while most of them will be just as crappy a photographer as before, some are bound to out-talent (and eventually outnumber) the so-called "pros"
and some of those who are really good are bound to do it as a means of expressing themselves (giving the results away for fame - getting laid being the ultimate purpose
I expect to see this meta tags on most sites in the near future.
yep, just like you can't find anything on bugmenot any more, everyone "opted out"
kinda defeats the purpose of ad blocking.
I'm rather sure that if religious types would keep their religion for themselves and contain their own wackos nobody would have a problem with them.
But when:
it starts to become annoying. really annoying.
OK, the source & destination IP will be known by the "bad guys", but everything else is encrypted. The old excuse of "it takes too much CPU" was valid...back in the 1990s, but no longer. C'mon people! HTTPS *everywhere*!
not very likely, taking into account that browsers have been waging war against self-signed/free certificates for a while and the "warnings" are getting worse with every release (I, a geek, had a hard time finding the tiny "add an exception" in Firesloth^H^H^H^H^Hfox 3, and found it impossible to explain over the phone how to do it to someone not so computer literate)
In that case check out Air Semi
yeah, according to that page, they are winners of the "Red herring Europe" award
"Religion is something left over from the infancy of our intelligence, it will fade away as we adopt reason and science as our guidelines." -- Bertrand Russell