A disparity of third-world proportions? Get real.

The disparity in the US is huge, yes, but being poor in the US is a picnic compared to the third world. No one in the US needs to starve. You have a roof over your head. You have at least some money for luxuries like a mobile phone and a TV. Comparing this to third world poverty shows that you've never been to the third world.

These idiots want to drive the high-tech companies out of San Francisco? Maybe they should look at places like Detroit, where most industry is gone. They are idiots, pure and simple.

I don't get all the people bashing the design?

Just think how long the rover has been on Mars - far longer than ever expected. It has a few dings in the wheels. Amazing machine!

NASA is next to useless nowadays - a massive bureaucracy that puts out only the smallest of missions in return for it's massive budget. Sure, the Mars rovers are impressive, but that is just exactly how many missions over how many years for how much money? Pournelle's iron law at work...

Far better would be to offer prizes to private industry. First company to send a lander to Mars that does X and Y: prize $100,000,000. First company that manages this on Venus: prize $500,000,000. First probe to "land" on an asteroid. First company to refine metal from an asteroid. First company to refine fuel on the moon. You get the idea...

Close fricking NASA. For $16 billion a year you can buy a lot of private innovation.

Right, sure they did. A BIOS attack of the sort hinted at in this interview is difficult to believe.

If they worked with computer manufacturers to close some such massive security hole, then they can easily point to the historical vulnerability. The technical community can verify their claims. Failing that, no, I do not believe such an attack ever existed outside the overheated imagination of some technically illiterate NSA bureaucrat.

In other news, I have a bridge I'd like to sell you.

From TFA: "But their special counting words are all decimal numbers multiplied by powers of two, which are 1, 2, 4, 8 . Specifically, takau equals 10; paua equals 20; tataua, 40; and varu, 80."

So, when working with large quantities, they tended to double things. One heap, two heaps, four heaps. (A) That's not binary math, that's just groupings that they found convenient. The fact that ancient traders introduced 12 and 60 as convenient grouping (because they can be easily subdivided) doesn't mean that anyone ever did base-12 or base-60 arithmetic.

Another sociologist looking for a quick paper to boost the all-important publication count.

This is a really hard situation. Not least because the stress of provided continual tech support for a low-skills user ends up putting a lot of strain on otherwise good family relationships.

My solution, in the end, was to practically force my mother onto an Apple. Apple is a better basis than Windows for users who otherwise muck things up. Also, dunno if this is still available, but at the time the "geniuses" provided her with decent support for a pretty marginal annual fee - relieving me of a lot of the tech-support stuff (why can't I print? I can't get on the Internet! - usually something silly). This was a relief all around.

Failing that, why not Linux. Mint/Cinnamon can be made to look a lot like Windows. Assuming it's an older version of MS-Office, LibreOffice is nearly a plug-in replacement. If Email isn't already in the web, put it there. Browsers are browsers, and no one should be using IE anyway. Set up a Linux machine with three desktop icons: Browser, Email (link) and LibreOffice Writer. Make everything read-only except where documents are saved, uninstall everything else (or at least remove the obvious shortcuts).

The thing is: all the horrific crimes you name are what the authorities need to go after. Auxiliary laws about money laundering are designed to make their job easier, and the authorities are so focused on chasing the criminals that they do not care about the collateral damage that these laws cause.

It's really no different that the law that makes it illegal to lie to a federal officer. The FBI is the classic example, because only the FBI is allowed to keep a record of what you say. That record is not objective, but instead consists of handwritten notes. They use this as a tool to force people to confess to crimes, or to testify to whatever the FBI wants them to. A very useful tool for the FBI - and one that has screwed thousands of innocent people.

The same for "structuring" bank transactions. If I choose to make two $9999 deposits into my bank account, this may well be prosecuted as a felony, even in the absence of any other criminal activity.

Law enforcement has an important job. However, they should be able to do this job without all of these secondary laws that create crimes where none exist. If they cannot, then: better a ten guilty people go free than one innocent person go to jail.

Ok, let's go back to basics: why is money laundering illegal? Why are banks required to report transactions over $10000; and why is structuring (making multiple transactions just below this threshold) illegal?

These are all laws designed to make the job of law enforcement easier. There's nothing inherently wrong with depositing $9999 into your back account, but do it twice and you may be up on charges even if your transactions were perfectly innocent. Similarly laws against money laundering are vague, and trip up more innocent people than guilty ones. All money laundering mean, at its root, is having a series of transactions: Buy yacht, trade it for a diamond ring, sell the ring. There's nothing wrong with that series of transactions, but because they are hard for the government to track, it is somehow your fault.

Three links of possible interest, concerning "The Archive AG" - mostly in German:

Company information

Article in the Handelszeitung

Web site

The address appears (on Google maps) to be more than just a mailbox. The two people running it are Germans - it's not clear why their company is in Switzerland. Downloading in Switzerland is legal, by the way, justified by the fact that we all pay these surcharges on empty media.

For anyone who has been threatened by The Archive AG, the article in the Handelszeitung includes a reference to an IT attorney who is apparently advising many people in this case.

Here's one Swiss hoping we can vote FATCA down a black hole.

Our government sees itself in a difficult situation: we are very dependent on open trade agreements, not least because we are physically surrounded by the EU. So our government rolls over any time open trade is threatened. Many of us think they need to take a harder line. For example, the agreement with the EU requires us to accept essentially unlimited numbers of immigrants - what sovereign country would ever sign away the right to determine its own immigration policy. Now we that we have the issue with FATCA, there is at least a chance that the population will tell the government that it has gone too far.

It all comes down to user interface design. A good interface will grab you attention only when it has something important to say. And it will avoid false warnings. A lousy interface *is* distracting. So is an interface that screws up, by grabbing your attention with incorrect or irrelevant information.

Just as an example: my current car has a very distracting audible and visual warning when it detects ice on the road. The problem is: this warning delivers 99% false positives (in fact, it seems to be triggered simply by the thermometer crossing a temperature threshold (3C), in either direction). So - yes - it is a dangerous distraction. However, if the manufacturer had actually gotten it right, it would have been very valuable.

As far as issuing commands, it is really the same thing: poor design. Is the interface reliable enough that you can trust it to do what you say? Does it give positive confirmation, or leave you wondering?

Not only are many (most?) academics fed up with the big journals, we are also generally fed up with publication pressure. Our school is just now going through a review. The accreditation people want number of publication. It doesn't matter what you wrote about, or whether you had anything useful to say, it's just numbers.

Who read about the University of Edinburgh physicist: He just won the Nobel prize, and has published a total of 10 papers in his entire career. As he said: today he wouldn't even get a job.

I understand that school administrations want some way to measure faculty performance. But just as student reviews are a dumb way to assess teaching quality (because demanding teachers may be rated as poorly as incompetent teachers), number of publications is a dumb way to assess research quality.

The cops have nothing better to do with their time? They have so many funds that they can buy special vehicles just to enforce this one traffic law?

Poor baby, he didn't get his way.

The musuem director said that the "Science Cafe" was the wrong forum, but that they would consider showing the film as part of a larger project.

This film is an advocacy film for one particular viewpoint, being pushed by one particular organization. The musuem rightly sees that showing this film alone, with no context or alternative viewpoints, may not be the best way to present a balanced viewpoint on a difficult and controversion subject.

According to the article, Tesla disabled the "sleep" mode of the onboard electronics, because it was buggy. As a result, they are running 24/7. Apparently, Tesla hasn't managed to fix the bugs with the sleep mode yet.

This is a perfectly explainable problem - no need to go all vampiric about it. It's a software (or possibly firmware) problem that they will undoubtedly sort soon enough.