Comment Re:And this is why there's traffic... (Score 1) 611
That was my assumption. It is also possible that non-freeway streets might not have sidewalks
That was my assumption. It is also possible that non-freeway streets might not have sidewalks
I don't know that freeway was specified but it's a fair point if that's part of your commute.
And Pirate Bay would just be telling you where the empty seats were or something like that in this tortured analogy.
If you don't understand either the definition of theft or what Pirate Bay actually does, sure.
Ca allows lane-splitting. Moped FTW.
Heck, Google cut loose Twitter when it came to having to pay for it and that was something that it probably was worth paying for. Don't mess with the G.
There is also a registry setting you can make which means the option in the start menu is set at whatever it was last time. Thus, if it was "shutdown" last time, it will be "shutdown" this time, even if there are updates pending.
Can't find that one but there are other options too. Here's one:
Wow, you stole land? No wonder you're posting AC. I bought mine.
So all the drug companies will do is spin off small sub-companies that own the rights to the drugs in question then defund and de-personnel them.
And make sure to "campaign contribute" to the right politicians to ensure this remains legal.
The correct response is to pass laws that removes patent protection on these drugs and allow generics to enter the market. Probably at a tiny fraction of the price of the original drug also. If the new drug really is that much better than the old one, it will succeed in any case.
It makes sense to write the laws based on that intent and to interpret the laws based on how they are written.
This is a horrible thing being done by the drug company but the correct action is to fix the laws, not allow judges to create new ones out of thin air.
I've often read about the classes being marked on a curve. That always seemed a little weird to me.
Here is a scientific way to find out: Walk up to one of them and say "Hi, my name is Tepples, what's yours?". Drop that whole collectivist bullshit.
DAC smoothing was explained to me by an audiophile doctor during the first couple of years of my physics degree. This would have been around 1990-91. I think your father may have just been mistaken.
"that wouldn't conflict with my preconceptions so I won't even consider them"
Then you're back into the "break as soon as you look at it" territory. Don't move the goalposts.
There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.
