Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Stupid thought of the day (Score 1) 239

Functionally, their "32 GB SSD drive" has about 7 GB of usable space before it maxes out in which they have to fit all their programs, utilities, miscellaneous pictures/video of the kids, games... or they can buy a normal laptop and we can get them a 500 GB internal drive and they're good to go for a decently long while.

And THAT is why the SSD's, even though OEM's would love to use them for marketroid reasons, are going to be a long time in making anything obsolete. I wouldn't use anything less than a 500GB drive for a machine today, whether laptop OR desktop, and the largest commercial SSD currently is a mere 128 GB.

His assertion is that 32GB is insufficient to run a functional system on. I asserted otherwise using my system as an example. While it's highly likely that a Vista install is larger than an XP install, it's unlikely that it's nearly 10GB larger.

So yes, I call shenanigans on his primary assertion; however I cannot speak to the availability of Sony drivers for a laptop.

Comment Re:Sun shoots, and... well, you already know. (Score 1) 249

I've got to say, from an IOPs perspective, that's extremely disappointing. ~24k IO/s max @ 8k. By their own chart they're getting about 233 IO/s per disk. I can get 1500 on a USB key on my desktop @ 8k. Granted, that's only running in 1 thread (they're using 128 which comes with some overhead).

I dunno, it just seems really low. I expected something more in the 200k-300k range.

Am I missing something critical? Are they running over a 100Mb network?

Slashdot Top Deals

"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein

Working...