Comment Trademark law is not copywrite law (Score 1) 144
Copyright is completely fucked. Trademark law is more or less sensible, and does useful things to protect consumers. This is an example.
Copyright is completely fucked. Trademark law is more or less sensible, and does useful things to protect consumers. This is an example.
You forgot availability. If If could hop a train to skip my 1.25 hour commute, I'd be on it in a heartbeat. Funding is an issue, but inter-jurisdictional planning is also a major barrier to getting anything useful done. Of course, big pots of Federal money tend to make the locals work together.
Don't forget about the ads!
Who puts this bullshit as "insightful"?
I have a botnet, and the terms of my parole say I can only use it on Slashdot.
The logs were never released. Seriously, where's the download? Instead, a summary chart was released. They have not, meanwhile, released any recordings of Broders several calls to Telsa support to discuss the fluctuating range indicator. Tesla makes nice cars, but they are not being transparent.
When he left the last charging station the car very clearly stated that it would not be able to reach the destination.
... because Tesla support told him, via phone, that the range indicator was unreliable below freezing, and that "range" would return as the battery warmed. They were right - the range improved - but not enough to get to the charger. You'll still filtering the story down to support the PR version of events.
Funny that Musk has declined to release logs of those phone calls.
The fundamental claim that Musk put out -- that the reporter intentionally drained the battery, and that the towing was faked -- has been completely disproven. The reporter used the car in non-optimal user behavior, and the car failed. This is entirely legitimate reviewing, and Musk called him a liar. '
Unfortunately, looking at how the FBI abused its powers decades ago....
Decades ago? You apparently haven't been following the sad story of the FBI and anti-globalization protestors in the 1990s, anti-war protestors in the 2000s, and Occupy activists in the 2010s.
A) This is inconsistent with the research into the neurology of "surfing." The machine influences how your brain behaves. You need to fix the machine. OP is asking for ways to do that.
B) Putting limiter software on is exactly the sort of self-imposed "remind yourself" that you're talking about. It's not like you can't uninstall it.
Change is hard. I get irritated with people insisting people "take responsibility for yourself" when they are, in fact, doing exactly that.
Chrome extension. Whitelists, blacklists and time-limited-browsing. Work hours / free hours set by weekly schedule. Set it and leave it. My favorite use case: kicks me off the web at midnight.
This bears little resemblance to what actually happened.
> If you're defective, you should get that fixed. Not expect the rest of us to modify our behavior.
This statement is the de facto definition of white male privilege.
You forgot just-in-time manufacturing. The "first edition" might be dozens of actual print runs.
A good Ask Slashdot will be educational to 95% of the readers and interesting to 5% with expertise in that discipline. "I don't want those 'apps' on it" is more like arguing with a version of me from 2004.
Neither of which have been made public. Only a blog post with an agenda.
8 Catfish = 1 Octo-puss
