Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment One OS to rule the all (Score 1) 375

So they are creating a GUI that will work on any device. Or rather each device running Win8 will look like the other Win8 devices. Unfortunately, I think they will be one step behind Apple. When you run a ppt/keynote file on an external display but off your Macbook, the main display is your slides, and the secondary display can be notes (notes you've written into your ppt/keynote file). To me this is where it's at! Using multiple displays for different functions, and having both screens in the full screen mode. My main issue with Windows is the full screen settings. Play a game, it maxes out on the primary display (D1), switch displays and the you loose the the full screen option on D1. You want to play full screen on D2, too bad, switch your displays around. You want to show a full screen pic on D2 while pausing your full screen game on D1, too bad you can't do that. Currently I only have 2 screens (22" & 40"), but in the near future I plat to add a third (27"). At some point I will add a fourth (55+"). Additionally, I would really like to plug my phone/netbook into my desktop and have the phone be able to access the power of the desktop. Personally, this is where MSFT should go.

Comment Re:Darn (Score 1) 788

Here is what happened. In 1999, Separation of commercial and investment banking was re-appealed (Glass Steagall 1933) The tech bubble burst. Allan Greenspan (Fed chairman) panicked and dropped the Fed fund rate to around 1%. Everyone jumped into housing (since house prices only go up). Banked issued mortgages, then rolled them up to create Mortgage Backed Securities (MSB) bonds. Theses bonds were sold to "investors". Tranches were created within the MBSes (more risk == higher yield). The rating agencies rated MBS as AAA. Housing was always going up, so if someone defaulted the bank repossessed an appreciated asset. Therefore, no risk. Banks sold MBS so they no longer carried the mortgages on thier books. There was no reason to be conservative with issuing mortgages. Enter sub-prime. Pension funds, institutional investors etc bought MBSes. To hedge their bets (protect from default) their bought MSB default insurance -> Credit Default Swaps. Everyone was making so much money trading MBSes and CDSes that no one asked what the heck was inside the actual "investment". Banks started drinking their own kool-aid (buying MBSes & CDSes). Then people stated defaulting on their mortgages. Housing stopped going up. Banks and "investors" started asking questions about the content of their "investments". and NOBODY new what they had. LIBOR (the overnight intrabank lending rate skyrocketed. Investments were carried on the books as mark-to-market. The market froze. So banks had to write down the value of their investments. The people holding the swaps were asked to pay up. Freddie, Fran, AIG, Bear & Lehman collapsed under the pressure ($135 trillion derivatives market). The Eurobanks bought heaps of swaps. The US Gov't came in a with a bailout (some money went to EuroBanks), and the Fed dropped rates to zero (some Fed loads went to EuroBanks). And most importantly the Gov't appealed the mark-to-market rule. Banks could now value the MBSes & CDSes at whatever they thought was reasonable -> mark-to-model. Voila, recovery! "Profits" are created from the improved "value" of the mark-to-model. Last month the CDS mark was $288 trillion. EuroBanks have learned their lesson. They bought swaps against their Greek, Port & Spanish debt. The US banks didn't learn their lesson, as they hold the other end of the swaps. When, NOT IF, but WHEN the Eurozone collapses it'll take the world economy with it. So in effect the people to blame are Greenspan, the rating agencies and congress for re-appealing Glass Steagall. Oh ya, congress also allowed Fran, Freddie and the big 5 investment banks to leverage their capital 30:1 (3.33% loss wipes them out). In summary, housing will not recover therefore the global marketplace cannot recover. The past 10 years of world growth was fueled by excessive and increasing leverage/credit. Today people are de-leveraging. This is a very tough investment environment. ~:-(

Comment Why use a new tech? (Score 1) 186

There are other features that are already available. Why not authentication via Bluetooth? Or use the phone's LCD display to output a barcode, or series of barcode type images. Or bar code images with some pseudo random time between images. There are countless other ways to use the existing phone tech. Why do we need new hardware in the phone? When choosing a phone, I want my dollars to go towards better existing tech such as faster processor, more RAM, better battery life, etc.

Comment Brutal (Score 2) 822

Overreaction due to a disaster by a reactor that should have never been built in the first place. It should be common sense to never build a device that cannot be tuned off (or 3 months to turn off). There are other nuclear reactor designs that can be turn off quickly. Banning the entire industry without a proper review is stupid.

Slashdot Top Deals

With your bare hands?!?

Working...