Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Programming

Submission + - Where's Your Coding Happy Place? (earthweb.com)

jammag writes: "Cranking out code — your very best code — requires being in the optimal environment, muses developer Eric Spiegel. He explores the pitfalls and joys of the usual locales, cubicle, home, the beach (okay, that's wishful thinking). He claims he's done his best coding on an airplane, strangely enough. In the end, though, he suggests that the best environment is a matter of the environment inside yourself, your internal mood — and to hell with the cubicle or wherever. You have to be focused on quality, regardless of the idiot clients. It's all inside your mind. Where's your coding happy place?"
Software

Submission + - Satyam Could Lose Half Its Customers Under Tech Ma (networkcomputing.in)

gubm writes: "Potential operational disruptions and lingering trust issues could cause troubled outsourcer Satyam to lose half its customer base or more as it moves to integrate with acquirer Tech Mahindra, according to analysts at research firm Gartner.
"Many risk assessments of Satyam — even with Tech Mahindra support — will likely result in scores lower than many competitors in a standard IT services evaluation," Gartner analyst Frances Karamouzis wrote in a report published this week. "In a buyer's market, it's less likely that enterprises will go with a newly formed, riskier entity."
The upshot: Satyam's revenue could shrink from about $2 billion to $1 billion over the next 12 to 18 months, according to the report. "Legal liabilities and account matters will likely loom for years," wrote Karamouzis."

Operating Systems

Submission + - Which OS Do You Primarily Develop FOR?

Paul Slocum writes: "1. Windows
2. MacOS
3. Linux
4. Unix
5. Real-time/embedded
6. old school (DOS, OS/2, AmigaOS, C64, etc.)
7. Like Cowboy Neal, I don't actually know how to program anything"
Software

Submission + - A little about new MT technologies

JorgeRamirez writes: "I am going to tell you something about the new generation of machine translation services and about one particular company which makes efforts in this field -Interlecta. I would call them the new David in machine translation technologies who will slay Goliath with just a slingshot. Goliath are all the huge world famous corporations which work in he filed but the results are somehow not satisfying. In most cases when people use machine translation services the result will be good enough for the person to receive a kick in the ... This is not a giant corporation which releases new products every day but what they have released so far is of high quality and will suit your needs. This is why I am writing exactly about them. What they do is develop a new product, release it and leave users do the rest. Quality stays above quantity. The usual problems with MT are synonymy, homonymy, complex syntax, cleft sentences and terms. Most of these turn to be a wall to high to be jumped over by machine translation services. However, the applications of Interlecta (www.interlecta.com) have jumped over the wall and dealt with this problems or at least with the greater part of them. The company uses new technologies and combines them in a way which will make the application the most suitable to use. Their translators support topical dictionaries -the thing a human translator would do when translating a text. MT as a whole is reaching new heights but this is the company which reaches them using different means in every direction and the results are really satisfying."

Comment Re:Oh, Joy, Joy, more oil comsumers (Score 1) 571

The tone of most comments doesnt seem to be a warning here. We should not let them have it hardly looks like a warning. And sorry for paiting 300 million ppl with the same brush but america as a country has little authority to tell any other country about carbon emissions. Borrowing from another post its like a cokehead telling a kid not to do drugs while snorting up one more line

Comment Re:And will be unavailable anyplace else.... (Score 1) 571

So you want people to give up benefits of cheap fuel because the US after polluting for more than half a century now thinks it has had enuf and the world shud follow. What kyoto tries to do is give the developing countries an incentive to follow a higher cost path to development. They have problems of ensuring survival of their populations right now and dont have the time or resources to think about what would happen 500 years down the road. If the a chosen few want to live the best of lifestyle while condemning millions to lower lifestyles they might as well not care about what happens later their life aint improving much anyway

Comment Re:And will be unavailable anyplace else.... (Score 2, Insightful) 571

Now i dont like to repeat myself but i posted this somewhere else. There is a cost of giving up gasoline. A cost which will mean it will take longer for these countries to get their people out of poverty if they use anything but proven technologies. The developed world has built up its infrastructure and its standard of living by accessing this cheap and readily accessible fuel. The developing has just reached a point where they have mastered the technology to use this fuel and they are being asked to cease and desist. The kyoto protocol which seeks to equalize this has been effectively blocked by the US and maybe their reasons make sense for the US but then stop talking about doing good for the world

Comment Re:Oh, Joy, Joy, more oil comsumers (Score 1) 571

I understand people in US need cars still dont understand the logic of single person riding in Ford F150. I live in the US and drive a small car I completely understand your warning as well but remember giving up gas today comes with a price these countries cannot afford. By asking them to give up on gas you are asking them to give up on an opportunity to improve their lives. The kyoto protocol addresses a lot of these problems but the US refuses to ratify it :(

Comment Re:Oh, Joy, Joy, more oil comsumers (Score 5, Insightful) 571

I don't understad why do drivers in the US who majorly drive big Ford trucks talk down to the developing world for driving small cars. Remember India with almost 4 times the population has a smaller carbon footprint than the US. Stop driving your gas guzzlers for the next 20 years before you get a right to talk about carbon footprints. After enjoying the economic benefits of gasoline you want the developing world to give it all up and stay poor is it ?

Slashdot Top Deals

The one day you'd sell your soul for something, souls are a glut.

Working...