Comment Re:Instead of flaming war between pro and antivacc (Score 1) 218
I do not dispute the science behind immunization.
I dispute the logic that you must take vaccine for everything.
I also would like more control in process of testing , specially that there is no financial connection between the industry and the testing facility.
When there is profit in question I do not belive in "goodness" of the board of directors or the policies of the industry.
I am paranoid about human nature in regards to extra profit.
Not in the science behind the theory.
"mild efects " are not what happened to a percentage of vaccine receivers ( for instance last year flu shots)
In Finland state finance the costs for health problems incured in vaccination. In my country there is not such thing.
So if a child of mine has consequences being in the minuscule percentage that will have hazardouse efects in the healt of the child.
The financial costs will be mine ( and my resouces are questionable in comparision to the rest of western society)
So would you take a the risks? It is always easy to point and say , nothing happened to me, but internet is full of sites where there are life stories of people who didn't have so much luck.
Vaccination should not make bigger risk then the issue you try to avoid by vaccination.