Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:I still don't understand... (Score 1) 187

Your post makes no sense. Care to enlighten us how Valve is "just like the old boss"?

You're completely free to create and run any number of free and open source games on SteamOS, none of which need to come from Steam itself, none of which need to be vetted by Valve. It's an open platform, completely free to use and modify. How is that even remotely similar to an Xbox or Microsoft?

I think you're spouting nonsense FUD.

Comment Re:"Pretty Much All of Them" (Score 4, Insightful) 189

No, not really. Comparing iOS and Android directly on performance is silly. They're two totally different ecosystems and hard performance numbers don't change much. That's like a typical user picking a Mac or Windows PC because one performs 5% better at random tasks, ignoring the fact that the offerings between each machine is radically different and pure performance numbers are only a tiny part of the whole picture.

Apple has no reason to cheat because they have no competition that merits the risk of cheating on. It might have been a different story had iOS hardware been available from multiple vendors.

Comment Re:Half-Life 3 guranteed within 1-2 years (Score 1) 150

I understand your rationale, but I think the Half-Life franchise has managed to maintain a level of interest on par or greater than franchises like Duke Nukem. Sure there are many who moved on, but it has been shown time and time again that there is still a very large following for the franchise to resume. It might not be all the same individuals from back in the day but it will definitely thrive if and when it comes out.

Comment Re:Like so many of these algorithms (Score 2) 115

"My friend owns a monster." -- You friend owns what? I don't think you meant a monster. -- "eh, you know, a very big dangerous jungle cat" -- oh, like a lion -- "not a lion, it has stripes" -- oh, a tiger.

Do you frequently converse with machine translators that elaborate the meaning of their mistranslations? Would be interested in knowing which one is capable of that. See when I use them it's what-you-see-is-what-you-get and I have to pick at the original source text with a dictionary to learn monster actually means tiger. That they can nonchalantly narrow the meaning down for you in a Star Trek-esque computer conversation is leaps and bounds ahead of what I'm used to!

Sarcasm aside for a moment, you're actually complaining that machine translators may eventually get so convincing that you might not even notice the errors anymore? Really? Sign me up for that scenario. Nothing should replace native translators anyway for precision work.

Comment Re:Gross, but... (Score 5, Informative) 618

Jeeze, did you even read the article you linked when pointing out heroin as the big bad or did you just look for the first article that had a bar graph with heroin seemingly on the top? It basically contradicts your entire attitude about heroin, and reaffirms the thought process of the person you're quoting, even if it was an exaggeration.

Here, let me quote something from your own link:

Firstly, the harms of a given drug will depend upon its legal status. The best way to demonstrate this point is with heroin, which is placed at the top of the Lancet-scale as the most harmful of all drugs. For street heroin this may well be the appropriate placing, but, if we are being scientific here, it is imperative to separate out the harms that follow from use of the drug per se, and the health and social harms exacerbated or created specifically by the drug's use within an illegal market. These, lets call them 'prohibition harms', include:

* Contaminated/cut product (poisoning, infection risks)
* Dirty/shared needles (Hep C / HIV risk)
* Vast quantities of low level acquisitive property crime to support a habit: illegal markets inflate the cost of an essentially worthless agricultural product to one that is worth more than its weight in gold. People on prescriptions don't have to nick stuff.
* Street prostitution (see above)
* Street dealing, drug-gang violence and turf wars
* Drug litter (needles in the gutter etc)

More useful would have been to rank both illegal street heroin, associated with the above harms which aren't going to help its ranking much, and prescribed pharmaceutical heroin, associated with none of the above harms. The latter would certainly be considerably further down the scale. Luckily, we can theoretically do this with heroin as both legal and illegal markets exist simultaneously in the UK, although the number of prescribed users (approx 400) is rather eclipsed by the number of illicit users (approx 250,000+). It’s a great shame the authors of this study failed to make that comparison (we do, confusingly, get 'street methadone' in the ranking, but not the prescription variety).

The harms from heroin don't generally come from heroin itself, but from the unsafe creation and use pervasive of today's users as a result of being illegal.

Slashdot Top Deals

Real Users are afraid they'll break the machine -- but they're never afraid to break your face.

Working...