Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:The differences between genders... (Score 1) 509

So, according to you the "average man" is actually male olympic standard... to compare the top women to average men is utter foolisness... The facts are verifyable. Look them up yourself.

That's not what I said so there is no need to overturn anything I said. To be clear:

...a amature men's running club. In other words even the most physically tough Olympic standard women are basically average compared to men.

Any average male competitor is going to out compete the women. I.e. the men who aren't even close to being competive with other men. They are amatuers are no one is going to pay to see them. They don't include me because I do not run. They aren't going to the Olympics due to this. Because there are so many better men it's ridiculous. I am not going to out run those women.

Comment Re:The differences between genders... (Score 0) 509

The fastest long distance running times for women wouldn't be acceptable as entry requirements for a amature men's running club.

In other words even the most physically tough Olympic standard women are basically average compared to men. That is absolutely a gap between genders no matter how you look at it. That I probably wouldn't be able to join a running club myself doesn't stop the fact that basically no women who ever existed would meet the requirements.

I mean why do you think women have their own groups in the first place?

Comment Re:its more than just political sensitivity (Score 3, Insightful) 136

Just because someone is technically a "layman" in the field doesn't mean that they are less knowledgeable than climate scientists.

I'm pretty sure that's what it means unless there's some ordination process to enter the Church of Climatology I don't know about.

Recall the fallacy of appeal to authority.

*False* authourity. Any old random scientist wouldn't be good enough. Appealing to a relevant expert is not a fallacy.

Comment Re:One Sixth Of A Child's Education (Score 1) 90

Children in public schools should not be experimented on.

Why not? It's happening anyway done for political reasons based on nothing but mere ideology. Why not actually apply some scientific scrutiny to the education system rather than come up with something like "No Child Left Behind," and then kind of hope it does what it's supposed to? Is that the system you prefer? Or do you advocate that things just stay as they are and never change? What do you think is better? Or is it just an irrational response to the concept of "experimentation" as if the process of just randomly muddling along was much more superior? How dare we subject our children to rigorous experimental situations that will help our education system in the long term! Leave them to the chaotic winds of ignorance is what God intended! It's clearly failed to work in the past, it can fail to work again!

Slashdot Top Deals

"The most important thing in a man is not what he knows, but what he is." -- Narciso Yepes

Working...