Unless they've changed the rules quite recently then you don't need a license unless you're using the device to view TV simultaneously with its broadcast. If you watch as catch-up (e.g. iPlayer) then a license is not needed - and if you just don't receive TV on the device at all you still don't need a license, even if it's a television or somesuch.

The licensing people are sometimes quite good at harassing people until they fork out for licenses that aren't needed; they come on relatively strong with the implied legal threats, so you need to be fairly sure of yourself if you're not buying a license. Nevertheless, in my experience, the actual written rules are more lenient than the impression the licensing people project.

To clarify, I don't mean broadcasts of live events but rather simultaneous viewing of something as it is broadcast. So for instance, watching Doctor Who (somehow) through the internet as it is broadcast would require a license. Waiting until the episode finishes and then watching it on iPlayer (catchup) doesn't require a license.

Having the device is, as I understand it, fine so long as you don't use it to receive live broadcasts (I was told that it doesn't matter whether those broadcasts are license fee funded). So if your PC isn't used to stream live broadcasts, it doesn't need a license. Using a TV as a monitor or for console gaming should also be fine, even though the device could receive TV in principle.

However, I think they tend to hassle addresses that have recently bought a TV and they tend to be somewhat threatening and vague regarding licenses, something which I strongly disapprove of. I've heard that if you're reasonably firm with them it's possible to make them stop hassling, their default just being to repeatedly send you warnings and hope that it encourages you to do the right thing...

The part that I think the parent finds objectionable - and I tend to agree - is the suggestion that they're actually removing features from already-sold devices. I don't think it's reasonable to remove functionality from a device after selling it, unless it's absolutely necessary to prevent damage to the device or danger to the user. They're welcome to remove it from devices that haven't yet sold, so long as people are clear what they're getting when they do purchase those devices.

I think the fact that Samsung would prefer not to have sold the functionality, in hindsight, shouldn't give them the right to remove it from their existing customers' private devices. If they are encouraged (for instance, via a class action) not to view this as a quick and simple solution then hopefully it will not become their first answer to future problems of this type.

This is the kind of article I'm always glad to see on Slashdot; emacs is cool, Lisp is cool, an article on something that's genuinely hardcore nerdy is always good to see! With the Linux on 8-bit micro article also posted today it feels like the nerd coefficient is running high today! Good!

Embedded has become a rather broad space these days as the range of computing hardware that's built into other devices gets more powerful at the high end.

Like the GP I think I'd usually prefer to think of a "systems language" as something that's suitable for kernel programming and for the low cost / simple CPU end of embedded work, where things can still be very highly resource constrained. But I can see why they're calling Go one, since I'd also expect a "systems language" to be suitable for writing OS utilities, servers, databases, etc - which Go probably is indeed suited to.

I do still hope we'll one day see a favoured C replacement emerge - one that has similar characteristics and abilities but which is nicer to code in. Not that C is bad at what it does - for the sorts of tasks it's good at it's still really quite good...

The hardware acceleration for video on the board is actually quite impressive. It can apparently decode 1080p video in real time, so even if it can't run a modern desktop very fast it can still be useful; there's a port of XMBC so you can use it as a media centre. You have to have proprietary drivers for the graphics acceleration but it's still cool. I'm not sure how integrated into the normal X11 stack these drivers are by now, earlier on in the project you'd just use the graphics library provided and drive the screen without X (as I understood it).

Yes - this! Actually, I'm not bothered about money staying in my own country or region so long as I know it's eventually going to people who play fair with their workforce. We've had a Fairtrade movement for things like coffee and chocolate - and it's starting to become more mainstream for things like clothing. But it's *very* difficult to find anything technology-wise that has any such guarantees.

I bought a cute little webcam from these guys: http://www.unitedpepper.org/ because they claimed to make it under fair trade-type conditions. It's maybe not the most technically sophisticated but it's a nice little thing and I really wanted to support a company that was trying to make a positive change.

Either way, I've got the money and I'd pay any reasonable premium for an ethically manufactured product, possibly a quite significant premium as long as they didn't make a shoddy device to cut costs elsewhere. But the industry currently isn't giving me the chance to give them that extra money, which seems a great shame.

I do make a point of researching welfare conditions before buying electronics and I often also write to companies before buying Far East manufactured goods. Often they don't respond - but at least they see some public interest. Plus I know that the ones who do get back to me with useful information are worth giving money to.

Maybe publishers should start paying gamers royalties for second hand sales? Every time a gamer manages to sell a second hand copy of a game with one-use DLC, that's a sale that the publisher hasn't had to spend money marketing. The friend he sold to will buy the DLC, so the original owner should get a cut of the marketing money saved.

That's on top of a discount for single-use games, obviously - and the right to compensation for time wasted when buyers find out their game has single-use content and return it for a refund.

I don't really think freedom of contract is sufficient to justify what the publishers are doing in this instance - for general societal well-being, there is law in place that governs contracts in ways that minimise what you might call consumer "surprise". So there are some things you can't put in contracts, a general principle that the party has to know they're signing up for it, etc. Enforcing these helps us in ways including having a freer market because companies can't use the legal system as an alternative to in-market competition. As this practice becomes widespread I think it's certainly inviting heavier government regulation - and I hope lawmakers will make steps towards intervention if it carries on, at least so that the industry makes a more serious choice about what's best.

As described there, doesn't that primarily involve border crossing? Or does it authorise the police to check anyone's origin in case someone's managed to sneak over the border illegally?

There's a campaign to help this man: https://peoplewithoutnation.wordpress.com/

Most recently, there's an appeal to write to the Prime Minister of Canada, who hasn't yet spoken out in support of Saeed:
https://peoplewithoutnation.wordpress.com/2012/01/19/take-action-write-a-letter-to-stephen-harper-canadas-prime-minister/

The death sentence could be carried out imminently.

Saeed Malekpour was in Iran to visit his gravely ill father. He was waiting for Canadian citizenship and the Iranian regime are aiming to make an example of him, having tortured him and denied him due process. I think the Canadian government does have a particular moral duty to stand up for him under the circumstances, although really all democratic governments ought to oppose this sort of thing.

The Iranian regime seems to have an interest in intimidating the population (and making an example out of cases that are highly-publicised internally, such as this one) since there's an election coming up in March, as well as the general interest in keeping the population scared.

Amnesty also have some information on the case:
http://www.amnesty.org/en/news/iran-must-halt-execution-web-programmer-2012-01-19

I'm just piecing together some information I've found here, I'm not connected to the case.

Wow, I've been a bit surprised by the criticism I've seen here. When I saw this I only thought "Getting to the pole: cool" "Riding bikes: fun and fast", so trying to combine the two just seemed like a nice idea. She's also intending to use kite skiing. It's not as impressive as trekking with less equipment, although equally it sounded like she's doing it alone, which is quite scary regardless. It will be interesting to see whether using this level of fairly basic technology helps, hinders or makes no difference.

That's true. I think there'll still be a place for these as separate boards though; for the educational and hobbyist markets (which I think is what they're targeting and expecting to be popular with) it's quite important to be able to easily replace broken devices and to be able to incorporate them into other designs.

Indeed - it looks like it's reusing a load of artwork from KDE *which is good*. With open source there's no reason not to slot in existing professional artwork straight away in a new project. They're even planning to make it easy to contribute their patches to common code back to KDE, so they're even being actively co-operative, which is always nice to see.

If they come up with something that looks nice and is lighter-weight than KDE then I might want to install it on my ancient netbook or in virtual machines. KDE is still my preference on my desktop.

Qt is a nice toolkit and it's good to see more development based on it. There's also the Trinity Desktop Environment, for folks who want a KDE-like lightweight desktop - it actually *is* KDE 3, further developed. It looks like (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trinity#Trinity_Build_Dependency_PKGBUILDs) that's based on Qt 3, whereas Razor-Qt can presumably use newer Qt versions from the start. Variety is nice, it's all cool.

This! I live in a bicycle friendly city and generally use my bike to commute. But even here you see people on their phones in cars on a regular basis (which is actually now illegal here), plus trying all kinds of crazy driving when impatient or not thinking straight. When you're cycling it's much more easy for one of those incidents to turn into a serious injury, since you have no protection at all from other people's vehicles.

But people don't have the mindset that they're operating a dangerous machine that they need to take responsibility for, so they just carry on doing it because they don't believe they're doing anything dangerous. I wish people would be taught more explicitly just how dangerous their car is.

With cyclists the situation is complicated because there's an eternal tension between what the two kinds of vehicles think they should be allowed to do on the road. But it's the same if you're driving, no matter what you do, some other folks either think their car is a toy or that nothing could possibly happen to them.