Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Why? (Score 1) 1233

Prove me wrong on the other fronts. And so far as I know, most Muslims don't want to be associated with extremists, or those advocating for extremism (you know, like WBC advocates for violence against people). Likewise Christians don't want to be associated with those groups. Now piss off.

Comment Re:Why? (Score -1, Troll) 1233

It's also sad because almost every religion has bad examples. Hell, the Talmud says that all gentiles should be slaughtered like animals simply for not being Jewish, but we don't keep Jews off of planes.

Comment Re:Why? (Score 5, Insightful) 1233

You realize, that Muslim extremists are to Islam what the Westboro Baptist Church, Tripura, Assam, Odisha, anti-abortion bombers, and Hutaree are for Christianity, right? Sickening examples that leave the majority just as disgusted as you, the outside observer.

Comment Re:Outbreak, not "plague"; dont be sensationalist. (Score 1) 668

The old death rate from measle pneumonia was 30%, and it still is for anyone who is immunocompromised (though with modern medicine it has dropped to as low as .3% for healthy people). 90% of unvaccinated people will get the disease when they come in contact with an infected person. Not disagreeing with you at all, those death rates only include the pneumonia side-effect.

Comment Re:Outbreak, not "plague"; dont be sensationalist. (Score 1) 668

I think this happens in almost every branch of medicine, and it doesn't specifically require 3rd world hacks. For instance, I have a history of getting peritonsillar abscesses about every other year (basically pre-tonsillitis, the cell barrier around the tonsil has been breached and if I get a bad sore throat, the whole thing turns into a massive abscess that has to be lanced, drained, and I have to be given huge amounts of antibiotics). I can't get my tonsil's removed because the recovery time for an adult is more than a month out of work. Several times now I have gone to the hospital, told the attending doctor exactly what the issue was, how it needed to be treated, what antibiotics work, what anabolic steroid to use, and how much liquified vicodin I need to be able to start eating again (your throat almost swells shut). More than 3/4ths of the time, the attending doctor would tell me it was just strep throat and give me some minor meds. I finally got fed up with it and pay the extra for no-referral insurance. I call the ENT, make an appointment, get my throat lanced, and am relieved in about 3 hours. I think the issue may have something to do with lots of resident hospitals using almost exclusively resident physicians. A resident is not the same thing as a full experienced doctor, and hospitals seem to forget that. Especially when it isn't your usual broken arm, gunshot wound or case of the sniffles.

Comment Re:Outbreak, not "plague"; dont be sensationalist. (Score 1) 668

We need a good plague to get idiots to realize how immunity works. We're about due anyways - it's been what, nearly a hundred years since the Spanish flu pandemic? It just makes me sad when you have people in Haiti and Africa literally begging for vaccinations so their kids might have a chance at survival, and affluent anti-vaxxers who are so deadset against it because there is a miniscule chance reported by a retracted study that their kid MIGHT get an ultimately survivable disease. Because you know, their kid becoming infected with a disease and spreading it to the rest of the susceptible population is SO much better. The dichotomy is heartbreaking. Buy the damn vaccine and send it overseas if you don't want it so someone who isn't a moron can have a chance.

Comment Re:Outbreak, not "plague"; dont be sensationalist. (Score 1) 668

Exactly. My kids are not more or less important than anyone else's kids. And that's the exact reason why they will be vaccinated. No one should be forced to deal with some disease because some looney decided to punch a gaping hole in our herd immunity. Sacrifice yourself, don't sacrifice others.

Comment Re:Outbreak, not "plague"; dont be sensationalist. (Score 1) 668

No, it means that the tested hypothesis has not been proven, and you must yield to the current null hypothesis. If you run an experiment and the results don't support the test, that *is* the result. When you start saying that you don't have a result, you end up with things like the Vioxx case.

Comment Re:Using up bandwidth (Score 1) 85

Your friend is most likely right next to the antenna, and that sucks. Comcast has the FCC license to broadcast at a way higher power than what is alotted for a home device. He should be able to use any wifi tool panel and see what channel it is on, and pick another for his home device. The WAP's only broadcast on a single channel, so far as I know. That gives your friend a lot of options.

Slashdot Top Deals

Were there fewer fools, knaves would starve. - Anonymous

Working...