Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Spending $20-$40 to get useless information (Score 5, Insightful) 56

Another big problem with the Elsevier model is that often after fully reading an academic paper, you realize that it is not very useful. I estimate that for every 10 academic papers I read, only about one is a worthwhile "keeper". So the true cost to find a useful academic paper, using the Elsevier model, is actually hundreds of dollars.

Comment The US Patent Office still requires Java (Score 1) 154

What is really annoying is that the US patent and trademark office (USPTO) still requires many of its users to use browsers running Java (not Javascript) for many applications. These days, that means running either Firefox or IE (classic). Persons using iOS or Android are out of luck.

Comment Google certainly influenced patents (Score 3, Informative) 47

Google has been highly influential in at least one area -- patents. The head of the USPTO and various high level patent judges are from Google. Google doesn't like software patents, and by some coincidence, software patents are being rejected right and left. So I think that they are getting their money's worth.

Comment Will it restore my "start" button? (Score 0) 160

Seriously -- due to some bug, my "start" button disappeared from Windows 10 after a few months use. Looking online, I see this is a common problem, and none of the suggested fixes worked. The only alternative was to "nuke" my Windows installation or install Classic Shell. Now using Classic Shell...

Comment Sounds like a great idea (Score 3, Insightful) 34

The basic concept sounds like a win-win for everyone. GSK gets to save money and act like the good guy, while the poorest countries get inexpensive drugs. Obviously the devil is in the details, but I am at a loss to think of a better solution. If you want new drugs, then at least the richer countries must pay their part of the development costs (a great way to totally kill new drug development is to deny patents everywhere). GSK's solution is similar to a progressive drug development tax.

Comment The all writs act is probably unconstitutional (Score 4, Insightful) 101

Personally, I think that the main reason why the Feds backed off is that they realized that if the all writs act ever gets to the Supreme Court, it is going down. Ironically a different part of the same 1789 judiciary act was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Marbury v. Madison (1803). This was the classic case where the Supreme Court struck down an act of Congress for the first time. Apple is an organization with enough power and credibility to take this case to the Supreme Court. So it made sense to back off and preserve the "validity" of the all writs act for future use.

Comment Improper assertion of trademark? (Score 2) 480

Ironically, it may be Kik's attorneys that acted improperly here. Trademark law allows similar names to be reused for different fields of use, so long as there is not a possibility of confusion/loss of market. Here I seriously doubt that anyone would confuse a Javascript module with a chat application. So quite possibly this was a bogus assertion in the first place, which ended up causing serious damage to a lot of folks.

Comment How about a "UL approved" instead? (Score 1, Interesting) 71

Instead of an "FDA for Data and Algorithms", I would recommend a non-government testing agency instead. Many of these exist already (think UL, "consumer reports", or European "notified bodies"). This requires that the industry agree on certain testing standards, and post on their websites when the algorithms have been certified. This could bring a lot of benefits without the drawbacks of government control.

Slashdot Top Deals

"It is hard to overstate the debt that we owe to men and women of genius." -- Robert G. Ingersoll

Working...