And Microsoft isn't doing the same?
I'm all for informing people on what information they give to companies, and how those companies will use it. But at least don't be hypocritical about it.
Also, a huge part of the world doesn't care, as is obvious by their Facebook and Twitter activity.
Own? Guess again.
You paid for a medium and format specific license.
The producers, artists and performers don't own the copyright. So for who was this again?
First of all, that is the stupidest fucking idea I have ever heard, even by dumbass Hollywood standards.
I guess you haven't heard about: Battleship. It really is based on the table top game.
It really doesn't look comfortable to use. Must be awesome to develop RSI with.
With a little bit of practice you can easily use a normal keyboard without looking at it all the time.
And something with learning new tricks
The major evolution that is still going on for me is towards a more functional programming style, which involves unlearning a lot of old habits, and backing away from some OOP directions.
One might suggest that every good programmer, if they spend enough time improving, eventually moves toward a more functional programming style.
That is more or less the same conclusion/train of thought Epic Games' Tim Sweeny had in 2005: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1111037.1111061 (note: slides of the talk can be found on the internet).
24 hours after that post from some guy on the adobe forums, and the page with downloads and keys is still there with no mention of requiring any previous license whatsoever.
Target audience is the hardcore gamers that play on consoles or higher end PCs. Why would they trying the mess with an inferior system as a tablet.
Free is a major French ISP,[...] and no restrictions on VOIP, tethering... full net neutrality in fact. [...] They have a long-standing dispute with Google though, about who should pay for bigger tubes between their servers and YouTube, which is unusable at peak time for Free subscribers. Free have been advising their clients to use Dailymotion instead, and don't want to pay for extra bandwidth. Free users are very dissatisfied, and this is becoming a *major* issue.
The ad-blocking move, which seems right now to target mainly Google, is probably mostly a bargaining chip to get Google to pay for better YouTube access for Free.
How is that net neutral?
Run his code through a static analysis tool with default, or best practice, settings, and then have him explain why the detected problems are false positives.
The best way for people to learn that their code sucks is to have a 3rd, impartial, party tell them. Static code analysis tools are the best, because they have no ears.
Telling them directly their code sucks is the worst way.
You're speaking semantically, not technically.
If you want to give the creators (2 Player Productions) money for their creation, you can do it here: http://www.theminecraftmovie.com/
The summary could at least have mentioned that.
Considering most people can't perceive frame rates faster than 30
[Citation Needed]
The difference is very noticeable, but the "problem" is reduced due to enormous input lag that is present in most console setups. Also in action heavy scenes you will notice it less that everything is moving less smooth.
The difference in 30 fps vs 60 fps for cameras is less noticeable due to motion blur unless you slow down the rendering. Sure you can make 30 fps games look smoother by applying motion blur, but that only makes the end result blurrier.
The majority of EA and Activision games are developed by EA and Activision owned studios. So, they develop games themselves, just like Zynga.
Were there fewer fools, knaves would starve. - Anonymous
