Sure, if you're working in a job, and have skills that are more valuable elsewhere, go for it. A lot of people can do that.
I fixed that for you. Why should anyone stay a company when they can do better elsewhere?
The majority of those "I can get something better" folks... won't.
That is not what the unemployment rate is saying.
Even if they could potentially talk their way into those (generally mythical) "good, easy jobs without real skill requirements,"
Except that isn't what is happening. Employees aren't quitting to look for "good, easy jobs without real skill requirements". They are quitting for jobs that are marginally better in pay, hours, conditions, or benefits. People are leaving jobs that pay $12.00 to go to jobs that pay $13.50. People are leaving part time jobs for full time jobs. People are leaving jobs that have hours that shift all the time for jobs that have stable work hours. It doesn't have to be a unicorn job, it just has to be better than what they are doing now.
Companies have been squeezing employees since 2010
2010? You are joking right? Try since 1965. But it really took off in 1980 with the advent of "trickle down" economics and tax cuts for the rich and corporations.
Given that India contributed 2.5 metric tons of CO per capita in 2018 vs 18.44 metric tons in the USA
You misspelt decrease in standard of living.
Let's examine that
For urban areas, it was Rs 1000 per month or Rs 33 per day. Using this methodology, the population below the poverty line in 2009-2010 was 354 million (29.6% of the population) and that in 2011-2012 was 269 million (21.9% of the population)
21% of the population of India lives below the poverty line at last count. They stopped counting in 2011 because the numbers were so bad.
For clarity, Rs 1000 per month is roughly $13.00 per month.
13% of the Indian homes either have no electricity or use generators for electricity
82% of rural households and almost 60% of urban households in India don't have running water
50% of people living in India don't have internet access
14% of the population is undernourished in India.
Are you ready to live with that standard of living? If not, why are you suggesting it?
These requirements are being imposed not by regulators but by Mastercard, a credit-card giant. Websites can always choose not to work with Mastercard. But given that the company handles about 30% of all card payments made outside China, to do so would be costly. Visa, which manages a further 60% of payments, is also taking a firmer line on adult sites. And the trend goes beyond porn. In the shadier corners of the web, and in industries where the law is unclear or out of date, financial firms are finding themselves acting as de facto regulators.
The credit card companies are doing it to themselves because they are bowing to pressure from cancel culture and SJWs. If they don't want to be the "de facto regulators" of the internet, then they should stand up to those who are demanding that they regulate the internet.
"Ada is the work of an architect, not a computer scientist." - Jean Icbiah, inventor of Ada, weenie