Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Censorship

Submission + - Germany's next censorship state

TheTinyToon writes: With a vote of 389 in favor of and 128 reject votes, the proposed censorship law to block childporn has been passed by the german government. Not surprisingly, a member of the conservative party (CDU) announced to also check, if the law could be extended to include so-called killergames like Counterstrike, only two hours after the law was passed. More on http://netzpolitik.org/2009/bundestag-beschliesst-netzzensur/ (german only for now)

Anyone in for a bet when the "creative" industry is knocking on the door?

Comment Re:A petition? how effective... (Score 1) 420

It is impossible to put anything on a ballot through an online petition. Each federal, state, county and local governments all have strict laws on how petitions are to be conducted and how many signatures are needed.

Most petitions I have seen are ineffective unless someone is paying hundreds or thousands of people to canvass...though online petitioning has played a monumental role in the Net Neutrality battle.

-n00b

Comment This can't all be true (Score 1) 1

I didn't have the focus to actually read the bill, it was especially difficult because various sections referred to outside documents. However, as a vegetarian and as someone who who has seen the mainstream penetration of the organic food idustry, I am sure someone is misinterpreting something.

The Daily Green claims to debunk some of the myths presented. Their language is a bit too vague for comfort as well, but I hope they know what they are talking about.

Myths and Facts: H.R. 875 â" The Food Safety Modernization Act MYTH: H.R. 875 "makes it illegal to grow your own garden" and would result in the "criminalization of the backyard gardener." FACT: There is no language in the bill that would regulate, penalize, or shut down backyard gardens. This bill is focused on ensuring the safety of foods sold in supermarkets.

MYTH: H.R. 875 would mean a "goodbye to farmers markets" because the bill would "require such a burdensome complexity of rules, inspections, licensing, fees, and penalties for each farmer who wishes to sell locally - a fruit stand, at a farmers market." FACT: There is no language in the bill that would result in farmers markets being regulated, penalized any fines, or shut down. Farmers markets would be able to continue to flourish under the bill. In fact, the bill would insist that imported foods meet strict safety standards to ensure that unsafe imported foods are not competing with locally-grown foods.

MYTH: H.R. 875 would result in the "death of organic farming." FACT: There is no language in the bill that would stop organic farming. The National Organic Program (NOP) is under the jurisdiction of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). The Food Safety Modernization Act only addresses food safety issues under the jurisdiction of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

MYTH: The bill would implement a national animal ID system. FACT: There is no language in the bill that would implement a national animal ID system. Animal identification issues are under the jurisdiction of the USDA. The Food Safety Modernization Act addresses issues under the jurisdiction of the FDA.

MYTH: The bill is supported by the large agribusiness industry. FACT: No large agribusiness companies have expressed support for this bill. This bill is being supported by several Members of Congress who have strong progressive records on issues involving farmers markets, organic farming, and locally-grown foods (Barbara Lee, etc.). Also, H.R. 875 is the only food safety legislation that has been supported by all the major consumer and food safety groups, including:
âCenter for Foodborne Illness Research & Prevention
âCenter for Science in the Public Interest
âConsumer Federation of America
âConsumers Union
âFood & Water Watch
âThe Pew Charitable Trusts
âSafe Tables Our Priority
âTrust for Americaâ(TM)s Health
MYTH: The bill will pass the Congress next week without amendments or debate. FACT: Food safety legislation has yet to be considered by any Congressional committee.


-n00b
Media

Submission + - British court rules against whistleblower bloggers (timesonline.co.uk)

An anonymous reader writes: In a dangerous judgment for British bloggers and whistleblowers, a British court has ruled absurdly that simply because blogging itself is a public activity, bloggers have "no reasonable expectation of privacy" regarding their identities, and newspapers are allowed to publish their identities if they can find them by fair or foul means. A British police detective who recently won the Orwell Prize for his excellent political writing used his blog to write highly critical accounts of police activities and unethical behavior, making very powerful enemies in the process. A well-funded newspaper with powerful connections quickly heard of his blog and decided it was absolutely vital to expose his identity using an investigative journalist. Like any good newspaper, the blogger anonymized the people and the locations in all the cases he discussed on his blog, but the newspaper alleges these were not sufficiently anonymized and complains that they could work out the identities, though British newspapers don't complain that they are allowed to publish the identities of men who are falsely accused of rape and cleared in court. The newspaper also helpfully contacted the blogger's employer, and his job is now threatened.
Biotech

Submission + - Monsanto backed bill could outlaw organic farming 1

scubamage writes: Congresswoman Rosa Delauro (D-CT) has introduced legislation which could potentially destroy both small and organic farming as we know it. The bill, HR 875, forces pesticides, herbicides, and any new chemicals developed to be used by all farmers in the name of "food safety and sanitation." It would also seek to outlaw seed banking, enforce mandatory GPS tracking of all livestock, and to create a new governing body to oversee food safety without any oversight. This includes warrantless searches of all food production facilities. Further, it would require such intense record keeping that it could quite literally strangle many small farmers out of business. It is also interesting to note that Ms. Delauro is married to Stanley Greenberg — a political strategist whose clients include none other than Monsanto: the world's largest producer of herbicides, pesticides, and genetically modified food products.
Censorship

Submission + - City Councilman Arrested for Anonymous Flier. (dailykos.com)

arbitraryaardvark writes: "Clarksville West Virgina City Councilman Martin Shaffer was arrested June 2 for suspicion of conspiring to distribute an anonymous newsletter. In "prosecuting anonymous speech, that's what's criminal" Reid Cox, Center for Competitive Politics, explains that the arrest was probably illegal and unconstitutional. What's this got to do with computers, the internet, or slashdot? Anonymous speech by anonymous cowards is one of things that makes slashdot and the internet as we know it possible. More background on the story at some blog."
Biotech

Submission + - Bill Gates helps fund mass circumcision programme (newscientist.com)

Cory Foy writes: "From the New Scientist article: "Microsoft founder Bill Gates last week injected $50 million into a programme to circumcise up to 650,000 men in Swaziland and Zambia...Funded for five years through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the programme is the first to massively scale up provision of circumcision by fully trained medical practitioners.""
Censorship

Submission + - Planned censorship infrastructure in Germany

Joerg writes: "Hello,

until now, the German media including the Internet are free and not censored. But the German government plans to introduce a system which can block any domain at the DNS server. Each German Internet Provider must install such systems, the filtered domains will be kept secret. The domains will be selected by the federal german police without involvement of any court.

Currently there is a online petition running against this plans. This petition is a high official procedure of "Deutscher Bundestag" our parliament. Anybody can vote for this petition, including foreign people!

You can find more information at:
http://piratenpartei-bayern.de/Signing_the_e-petition_for_Non-Germans

Best Regards,
Joerg"
Security

Submission + - Sniffing Browser History Without Javascript (making-the-web.com)

Ergasiophobia writes: "I'm just going to quote the page itself here, as it gives a pretty good description.

It actually works pretty simply — it is simpler than the Javascript implementation. All it does is load a page (in a hidden Iframe) which contains lots of links. If a link is visited, a background (which isn't really a background) is loaded as defined in the CSS. The "background" image will log the information, and then store it (and, in this case, it is displayed to you).

http://www.making-the-web.com/misc/sites-you-visit/nojs/ Is a demonstration of a method to find out the browsing history of a visitor to a website, no javascript required. It seems the only drawbacks to this method are the increased load on your browser, and that it requires a list of websites to check against."

The Courts

Submission + - RIAA Case, Capitol v. Thomas #2, Starts Monday (startribune.com)

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes: "The RIAA's first trial verdict having been tossed out last year, the RIAA is coming back for a second bite at the apple starting Monday. This time the trial will be in Minneapolis, rather than Duluth, and this time the defendant will have a team of pro bono lawyers on her side. But perhaps the most important new development is that this time the 'technical' evidence garnered by MediaSentry and 'explained' by the RIAA's expert witness Doug Jacobson, will not get the free pass it got the first time around. In the 2007 trial in Capitol Records v. Thomas, no objection was made by defendant's lawyer to the MediaSentry/Doug Jacobson 'evidence' upon which the RIAA relied, and the evidence was admitted without objection. This time there will be no free ride, as defendant's tech-savvy lawyers have already filed a list of objections to the RIAA's proposed exhibits. Most notably they attack the 'technical' materials submitted by MediaSentry and Dr. Doug Jacobson under Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which requires evidence based on 'scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge' to be based on sufficient facts or data, to be the product of reliable principles and methods, and to be the result of those principles and methods having been applied reliably to the facts of the case. If the evidence fails to meet those standards, it is inadmissible. This judge has already evidenced acute awareness of these principles, in deciding which subjects defendant's expert could and could not address. So this should be interesting."

Slashdot Top Deals

"It is hard to overstate the debt that we owe to men and women of genius." -- Robert G. Ingersoll

Working...