2011, Year of the Tablet?

Nope.

It may be time to venture out and try some others once again.

I've been using duck duck go for about a month and like it. Firefox integration, !bang syntax (!flickr, !youtube, !gimages, etc), keyboard shortcuts, fall over to Google if it doesn't find anything, etc. Good stuff.

A certain citrus celebration themed URL comes to mind

Yeah - I can't stand those a-holes either. F--kin douchebags.

Just too bad? Iffy? *shrugs* Works just fine for me.

Option 6: ushare + XBox360 (or any player that supports UPnP)
   

There exist these places, stores really. They sell books. I hear they even have one on the internet now. Anyway, in this place is a book which is just a list of words. This book has definitions for each word in the list. I mean, that's it's reason for existence. That's what it does - it defines words. It's usually pretty large. (Although they do sell smaller, abridged versions.) It's called a dictionary. I suggest you pick one up. Once you do that, you can learn the meanings of the words you use and we can all have an actual conversation because we have a shared vocabulary from which to build meaning and not just a vocabulary that is made up for argumentative convenience on the spot.

Keep me posted.

Atheists stake their eternal future...

Huh. Never seen a clearer example of begging the question in the wild before. To assume one's future is "eternal" presupposes an afterlife.

Err... Hawking, Richard Dawkins, Chrisopher Hitchens, Salman Rushdie, and quite a few others will be surprised when they find out that they are not American!

Europa is not a country. But I'd say that Europeans are a nation because they share culture, ethnic origin, and often the language

You're crazy. They don't share language, culture, or ethnic origin. "Nation" is a word, it has a definition. You don't just get to make up the definition to suit your point of view. Sorry.

Again: if you're going to just ignore the definitions of words, what's the point of trying to engage you in conversation? I guess the most of the world is a nation as they are members of the UN, correct?

It's no use trying to convince these idiots. They simply refuse to acknowledge anything that doesn't cause them to be outraged and afraid. I went to the "anti-mosque" rally a few weeks ago to take photos. They are a delusional bunch of people.

And this has what to do with Park51, the topic at hand? No one has filed a lawsuit. There is no security decision.

Your comment is a non sequitur.

If you're going to just ignore the definitions of words, what's the point of trying to engage you in conversation?

I can try to explain it simply, but I suspect you will not acknowledge the direct comparison.

[group] gets mad when people assume [thing about the group] based on the actions of a very, very few extreme members of the group when that is not at all true.

[Right-wingers] get mad when people assume [they are as bad as the Taliban] based on the actions of a very, very few extreme members of the group when that is not at all true.

[Muslims] get mad when people assume [they want to violently kill Americans] based on the actions of a very, very few extreme members of the group when that is not at all true.

It is no more complicated than that. Get it?

Man, when /. posts a story on advertising all the whackos come out of the woodwork.

Man - ain't that the truth?

*cough* *cough*