[Citation needed]

I suppose we shouldn't waste our time thinking about solutions to problems if a) you think a key-word assigned to that solution is inaccurate or b) it isn't the best possible thing right out of the box.

All data is integer data. Recall that we're working with a computer, here.

To make it so it sounded synchronized to him, he would only have to sing normally with the music. Unless you mean make it so the amplified version of his voice was in sync, in which case it would sound great to everyone *except* him.

Since only one of those requires effort, and he said there was effort involved, I'm gonna say it sounded great to the front row as well as the back.

Assuming the music was great in the first place. s/great/in sync/

Or Diamond Age, as that book is actually about nano-tech.

Won't they want to be able to have a small profile?

Seems like some sort of lozenge shape would work best for this.

This is a search engine we're talking about, here. What is there other than "Search for X" anecdotes?

Hay Guys! P is not NP! It's obvious!

That slashdotter must be very dense indeed.

Or, if you parse what was said correctly, you realize that the analogy is that you shouldn't make having a garden of your own a requirement for hiring.

Facebook should hire some of Diebold's lawyers. They're really good at keeping source private.

You describe something that would necessarily be intractable to compute. The best we can hope for is an approximation.

The game was coded up from scratch, as far as I know. It does use Nintendo-owned graphics, though :) But as he makes no money distributing his game (it is released into the public domain) I doubt the Nintendo lawyers would care.

It was perfectly "fair", in that all players started on equal footing. But perhaps they aren't rewarding the things that you personally think should be rewarded.

Nothing at all rhymes with orange,
except maybe try a door hinge.

That will be £163,424 please.