Post hoc ergo propter hoc .

The logical argument works as follows:

If it happened "by coincidence" (i.e. the events were unrelated), the probability that it JUST CHANGED the day after the SOPA protests was exactly the same as the probability that it changed 2 days after. And the same as the probability that it changed 3 days after, or the day of, or the day before, or n days before or after. All of which are near-zero probabilities.

Therefore, there is nothing particularly coincidental about it happening exactly 1 day after.

I.e., correlation != causation.

Unless you have something better than "it's too coincidental to be a coincidence", you have nothing.

Mexico has jurisdiction over the body.
The US has jurisdiction over you, to decide whether you had violated any US laws.
Mexico also has the right to ask the US to extradite you to Mexico to face trial if they believed you had violated Mexican laws (e.g. firing across their border, murdering a Mexican citizen on foreign soil).

Wait, was that not a serious question?

Yes.

Or for the tropical fish department of PetsMart.

What were we talking about?

For "J" they'll buck the trend of desserts and name it "John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt".

What would you do for an Android SDK?

But you do realize that the *current* generation of tech inside pacemakers manages to last a bit longer than one year, right?

Why, don't they have calendars?

That depends on what your definition of "know" is. Technically, she only gave him a blowjob, which wouldn't qualify for definition #3.

No shit, for some reason I was thinking that kind of fiber, too - all the way up until I read "fiber network", anyway. Glad to know I wasn't the only one.

Come to think of it, "no shit" was probably the wrong phrase to use that context...

I use http://www.fakenamegenerator.com/

No... suing people to keep his trademark going in perpetuity. *shudder*

-Russell S. Harris

They're the Ents, obviously. Slow-moving and a little bit stuck-in-their-ways, but finally pissed off enough to uproot and go on the offensive.

That's a really fucking weird way to describe HTML.