I suggest you read the thread yourself.

Also - Not me. https://yro.slashdot.org/comme...
Not me either - terrible person minimizing the realities of it - https://yro.slashdot.org/comme...

Maybe before you accuse people of writing them, or the posts not existing, you should try not being illiterate and actually use your eyes.

There's several people in this thread doing exactly that. It's disgusting.

Sending armed invaders into anothers home over being beaten in a game isn't "for giggles", it's an act of terrorism.

It's not a prank call. It's filing a false police report with malicious intent to cause harm.

A prank call is asking someone if their refrigerator is running.

This guy made multiple bomb threats and tried to use the swat team to attack someone over being beaten in a video game. He deserves the prison time, and if anything 20 years is too low for the criminal maliciousness that he's displayed.

It's both the officers and this guys fault. This guy deliberately set up the conflict, using false information that placed the officers in a state of heightened alert leading to them being overly sensitive to any changing factors.

That heightened sensitivity lead to them reacting to a situation in a way that if it were not for the call initiator they would have not reacted to, or even been present for. Therefore, this guy carries the majority of fault as he created the situation deliberately and with malice.

Daily caller is not a legitimate news source. They're a propaganda outfit designed to fool the uneducated into a life long outrage using fearmongering and making anyone that isn't part of the daily caller/daily stormer/stormfront circle the "others"

Came here to say this.

I'll miss having CID control to the degree I can spoof any test number, but I never used it outside of initial CID testing or in the case of one customer who's end users wouldn't pick up after putting in a ticket, spoofing one of their own numbers to convince them to answer so we could fix their problem.

We fired that customer though, so basically just CID testing now (to ensure control, since some providers don't give you that control I've seen).

Any every single person who worked on trumps campaign has been investigated with several putting in plea deals, and over 80% being charged.

Also, trump was still the only one out of the two to be fined for laundering money for criminals (a criminal act in and of itself)
Trump was also the only president in US history to commit treason.

She's been investigated by corrupt republicans for over 35 years trying to force fake charges to stick without so much as a single charge being filed against her.

He's been fined 3x for money laundering for the Russian Mafia since 2005. He was also fined in 2006 for money laundering for the bank of Iran, who used that money to fund ISIS.

Doesn't quite seem on the same level.

There's more benefits than just insurance.

Vacation, pension/401k and bonuses all come to mind

I had the same thought. It's great that they're doing something to prevent it, but now the whole prevention method is broken.

Only on the local lan, and only if someone isn't actively spoofing said mac. The moment it leaves the local lan that info is discarded.

This is why you always use your own power block and usb cable. And don't by cheap knockoffs of the real power blocks/docks.

Or, get a few "power only" usb cables that are designed to block data transfers entirely.

Ah, I run BT and WiFi on, along with GPS. I keep cell off because that just cuts it down to like 10 hours if I enable it. I turn that on if I know I need it but that's rare.

I walk away from my phone for periods of time while in the same place that leave me not able to disable wifi, so I guess I'll stick with how I have it setup

I disagree.

Linux has it's place, but as an end user desktop in a production environment it's severely lacking. Software support for it is immature at best for the vast majority of products, and arcane at worst.

When it comes to web servers, I'll take linux in nearly every application of it, but when it comes to a corporate internal network? You're using windows.