Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment OpenGenera for Linux (Score 4, Interesting) 160

I deeply desire to have a Symbolics machine of my own some day—or at least a version of OpenGenera that boots properly.

You won't have one properly licensed, since the courts were unable to agree who owns the copyrights to Genera. On the other hand, that means you cannot be sued by the copyright holders, since nobody is quite sure who the copyright holders are.

You'll need:

Setting it up requires a little bit of work (you'll need to set up a local NFS server and to tweak your X server's modifier mappings), but I warmly recommend it -- it's complete enough to do some real work in Emacs, and the full sources and documentation are there for your greater enjoyment.

Comment Re:OpenNTPD (Score 4, Interesting) 142

have written most of OpenNTPD.

And you admit it?

I am sick and tired of wasting energy on each and every unfounded accusation someone posts somewhere.

Please show me where the OpenNTPD code computes the dispersion and root delay that it sends to clients, and I will retract my claim.

Comment OpenNTPD (Score 4, Informative) 142

OpenNTPD just ignored the leap second

OpenNTPD has clearly been written by someone who doesn't understand NTP. For example, it advertises incorrect root delay and disperson values, which can cause clients to fail to achieve a majority vote, or to pick the wrong peer to synchronise against. (Earlier versions were even worse, they advertised themselves as being at stratum 0, which could cause synchronisation loops; this has thankfully been fixed, but it doesn't inspire much confidence in the authors' competence.)

I've also found OpenNTP to fail to regulate the local clock on dodgy hardware (it would oscillate wildly, with an amplitude of 3 seconds or so), in situations where the reference ntpd coped just fine.

Folks, do yourself and everyone a favour -- run the reference NTP, run chrony, heck, run some SNTP client, but please avoid OpenNTPD.

Comment Re:Business opportunity (Score 1) 233

Linux configs vary a bit more in that v6 is not typically enabled by default

IPv6 is enabled by default on all Linux distributions known to me, and that has been the case for five years or so.

(Your confusion may stem from the fact that, unlike Windows, Linux distributions do not enable the Teredo protocol by default. But that's a different matter.)

--jch

Comment Re:Business opportunity (Score 1) 233

we can't just 'toss this machine out and buy new' (it's a 175k machine) [...] newer versions of Windows don't support the software that run on these computers

So you invest $175,000 without making sure you'll get software updates?

I rest my case -- it's your own fault.

--jch

Comment Re:What? They are still making Atom? (Score 2) 59

Microsoft somehow has the power to make everyone cripple their implementation of Atom to 2GB or less RAM supported

Can you cite an article showing how Microsoft is responsible? Google 2 gb atom limit microsoft failed me.

The following table specifies the limits on physical memory for Windows 7.
...
Windows 7 Starter 2 GB N/A

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa366778(v=vs.85).aspx

Comment Re:Business opportunity (Score 3, Informative) 233

Where is all the fucking Enterprise hardware and firmware updates to support it?.

Most large companies have been requiring IPv6-capable gear for the last 4 years or so, while the DoD mandages IPv6 support since 2005.

Because of that, most recent hardware and software is IPv6-capable. Cisco IOS, for example, has been doing IPv6 since 2001. Microsoft servers have been able to work over IPv6 since Server 2003. Mac OS X since 10.4, Linux since the 2.4 series.

If you're still stuck with IPv4-only hardware or software, it's your fault.

--jch

Slashdot Top Deals

Save a little money each month and at the end of the year you'll be surprised at how little you have. -- Ernest Haskins

Working...