Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:American Dad (Score 1) 100

That's because this idea has been floating around for awhile. This company was founded by Max Keiser, who created a model that would allow you to set up a Stock Exchange based on any market. Keiser, to say the least is a very colorful character.

Scarily enough, the Pentagon had once wanted to set up a similar stock exchange that would rely in predicting when terror attacks would occur.

He is doing a very interesting project called Pirate My Film where producers can finance their films by selling future copies of their movie, where investors can expect a share in any future profits from sale of the film.

http://www.piratemyfilm.com/

Comment Re:Huh! (Score 4, Interesting) 459

If the NHTSA didn't exist Toyota would have had to spend money to fix the problem instead of paying ex-regulators to quash multiple investigations.

Toyota (TM) hired ex-government regulators to kill at least four investigations into problems with its cars in the U.S. That's the conclusion of an investigation by Bloomberg. The news service reports that, "Christopher Tinto, vice president of regulatory affairs in Toyota's Washington office, and Christopher Santucci, who works for Tinto, helped persuade the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to end probes including those of 2002-2003 Toyota Camrys and Solaras, court documents show. Both men joined Toyota directly from NHTSA, Tinto in 1994 and Santucci in 2003. "

The same goes for Wall Street. Most of the financial regulators are former high level executives from Goldman Sachs or strong ties to them and other financial institutions.

I don't understand why we need so many useless regulators who are usually wolves being put in charge of the hen house when the courts could easily handle this. It's going to end up being prosecuted in a court of law anyway and not solved by some magic regulation hand-waving.

Comment Re:Mac (Score 1) 326

You mean, expansion packs which have just as much content as they normally would, just like any strategy game since C&C has done?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilization_IV:_Warlords

Warlords added many new features to the original game. These include:

A new category of Great People known as Great Generals;
The ability to institute vassal states;
Eight new scenarios[2]
Six new civilizations playable in single-player and multiplayer;

Ten new leaders (including new leaders for existing civilizations);
Three new leader traits (Charismatic, Protective and Imperialistic);
Unique buildings for each civilization;
Three new wonders;
New units, resources, and improvements;
Core gameplay tweaks and additions;
Inclusion of all patches released for original Civilization IV.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilization_IV:_Beyond_the_Sword

New content includes:

10 new civilizations and leaders (Babylonia, Byzantine Empire, Ethiopian Empire, Holy Roman Empire, Khmer Empire, the Mayans, Native Americans, Netherlands, Portugal and Sumer)
6 new leaders for existing civilizations (Abe Lincoln, de Gaulle, Boudica, Darius I, Suleiman the Magnificent and Pericles).
25 new units, 18 buildings and new technologies added primarily to the late game.[16]
11 new scenarios.[5]

6 new Wonders of the World.
New diplomatic resolutions through the United Nations.

Then you had Civ4: Colonization which was a standalone remake of the original Colonization with the Civ4 engine.

So Civ4 did exactly what Blizzard plans to do: add unique civilizations and single-player scenarios to be played along with other general improvements.

The only difference between Blizzard and Firaxis is Blizzard is upfront about how they are going to split up single player content and have yet to divulge their pricing scheme.

Comment Re:Lost my interest (Score 5, Insightful) 268

It seems a little odd to be upset that they are more upfront about their plans for expansion packs and the content that will be in them. Each race will still be playable in multiplayer. There is no indication that the SCII won't have as much single player content as the original SC, albeit you'll only be able to play one races campaign.

I'd much rather wait and see more details on what it entails before passing judgement.

Earth

Utah Assembly Passes Resolution Denying Climate Change 787

cowtamer writes "The Utah State Assembly has passed a resolution decrying climate change alarmists and urging '...the United States Environmental Protection Agency to immediately halt its carbon dioxide reduction policies and programs and withdraw its "Endangerment Finding" and related regulations until a full and independent investigation of climate data and global warming science can be substantiated.' Here is the full text of H.J.R 12." The resolution has no force of law. The Guardian article includes juicy tidbits from its original, far more colorful, version.

Comment Re:I'm pretty sure... (Score 2, Insightful) 409

The article states that he indeed, did:

Mr Atkinson was involved in introducing tough new laws to outlaw bikie gangs in South Australia several years ago.

At the time he said politicians and public officials had to put themselves "on the line" to take the gangs on.

How brave of him. Now he has to bravely face some teenager leaving a note at his door that most assuredly called him a "nigger faggot."

Comment Fuck you buddy (Score 1) 521

If you really want to have privacy in the digital age the only winning move is not to play. The people in control of things want to endlessly analyze every single thing they can in order to better control and shape society to their will and it is too easy to get that data through computers.

See: The Trap

Google

Five Years of YouTube and Forced Evolution 329

NakNak writes to mention that the DailyMaverick has a feature looking back at five years of YouTube, some of the massive changes that have been forced through as a result of its overwhelming popularity, and what changes might be necessary going forward. "Google, which bought YouTube less than two years after it was founded for what was then considered outrageously expensive $1.65 billion, does not want Microsoft or Apple (or anybody else) to own the dominant video format. So it has become the biggest early tester of HTML5. Your browser doesn't support HTML5? Google launches its own browser, Chrome. Need to use Internet Explorer at work because that's all your IT department supports? Google launches a Chrome framework that effectively subverts IE and makes it HTML5-compatible. The final blow will be the day that YouTube switches off Flash and starts streaming only to HTML5 browsers. On that day all browsers will be HTML5 compatible or they will perish in the flames of user outrage."

Slashdot Top Deals

Reference the NULL within NULL, it is the gateway to all wizardry.

Working...