Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Flashlight under a rock (Score 1) 209

The sad thing is this was not some big brother conspiracy. This policy was inspired by pure laziness -- a cheap way to do a background check. Instead of doing the work to interview, friends, colleagues, and employers to ensure the applicant has no gang affiliations, they used FB as a pre-screener for applicants.

Comment Re:Shoot anything armed you mean ... (Score 1) 127

No, these systems aren't designed to "save lives". These systems are designed to project power more efficiently, and the purpose of that is to impose commercial interests over nations that would not otherwise chosen to accept those at the terms they do when pressed.

The "saving lives" line is how they are being sold to the more conscientious of your population, but it is just that.

As I pointed out to you upthread, US is using advanced weaponry on citizens of other countries even when there is no war, just for intimidation.

Bitch all you want, but the US puts a lot more effort into avoiding civilian casualties than the insurgents. Blowing up a Mosque leaves no question as to motive: Kill as many innocent people as possible in a very public, "F You" kind of way.

Comment Re:First things first (Score 1) 312

Cost savings may not be the correct metric. There is a larger question: "What is the acceptable quality level for this product (and does our development model allow us to achieve this level of quality)?" Improving the quality of your product may very well cost you more money. If your current mode of doing things prevents you from meeting your organization's quality standard, it's time to have conversations about investing rather than saving.

Comment Re:And that's what's wrong! (Score 1) 222

The press wants to be the SOLE "Decider" of what the people get to see.

That's right. The writer and editor decide what get's published - it's what they do. No source would ever talk to a reporter if they knew everything they said or wrote would be published. WIRED is a private institution. It owns the information for which it invests heavily to acquire. If you don't like it, don't read WIRED and boycott their advertisers, or hit the street and do your own f'ing reporting.

Comment Re:yeah. well done. (Score 4, Insightful) 222

If you want to complain, complain about how the comment is not supported by the article. In it, Wired or its staff utterly fail to take a stance on Assange's actions at all...

Who says Wired needs to have a stance on the matter at all? This might be before your time, but journalism used to be about telling a story, not selling an opinion.

Comment Re:Quote (Score 1) 244

Yes, because as a fan a sane reaction to a report is arranging a flyover and aerial photography of the site involved... really it is, please keep telling yourself that.

Perfectly sane if you are a financial analyst or trading/holding a bunch of AAPL and want to get the scoop on the next product offering... or if you are a real estate agent trying to get some publicity.

Slashdot Top Deals

"This generation may be the one that will face Armageddon." -- Ronald Reagan, "People" magazine, December 26, 1985

Working...