Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Shoot anything armed you mean ... (Score 1) 127

No, these systems aren't designed to "save lives". These systems are designed to project power more efficiently, and the purpose of that is to impose commercial interests over nations that would not otherwise chosen to accept those at the terms they do when pressed.

The "saving lives" line is how they are being sold to the more conscientious of your population, but it is just that.

As I pointed out to you upthread, US is using advanced weaponry on citizens of other countries even when there is no war, just for intimidation.

Bitch all you want, but the US puts a lot more effort into avoiding civilian casualties than the insurgents. Blowing up a Mosque leaves no question as to motive: Kill as many innocent people as possible in a very public, "F You" kind of way.

Comment Re:First things first (Score 1) 312

Cost savings may not be the correct metric. There is a larger question: "What is the acceptable quality level for this product (and does our development model allow us to achieve this level of quality)?" Improving the quality of your product may very well cost you more money. If your current mode of doing things prevents you from meeting your organization's quality standard, it's time to have conversations about investing rather than saving.

Comment Re:And that's what's wrong! (Score 1) 222

The press wants to be the SOLE "Decider" of what the people get to see.

That's right. The writer and editor decide what get's published - it's what they do. No source would ever talk to a reporter if they knew everything they said or wrote would be published. WIRED is a private institution. It owns the information for which it invests heavily to acquire. If you don't like it, don't read WIRED and boycott their advertisers, or hit the street and do your own f'ing reporting.

Comment Re:yeah. well done. (Score 4, Insightful) 222

If you want to complain, complain about how the comment is not supported by the article. In it, Wired or its staff utterly fail to take a stance on Assange's actions at all...

Who says Wired needs to have a stance on the matter at all? This might be before your time, but journalism used to be about telling a story, not selling an opinion.

Comment Re:Quote (Score 1) 244

Yes, because as a fan a sane reaction to a report is arranging a flyover and aerial photography of the site involved... really it is, please keep telling yourself that.

Perfectly sane if you are a financial analyst or trading/holding a bunch of AAPL and want to get the scoop on the next product offering... or if you are a real estate agent trying to get some publicity.

Comment Re:Right then (Score 1) 528

You are assuming that average american actually likes what the American government is doing. If anything, wikileaks has shown how the government itself is putting national security, diplomatic relations and its citizens at risk just to benefit the military industrial and oil industry faction.

Not everyone in public is a stubborn moron like you, who refuses to appreciate being shown the truth.

Get off your soap box, Guardian Reader. Nowhere in my post, did I express my personal opinion. I was pointing out the flawed assumption that most Amazon customers would support Wiki-leaks actions.

Comment Re:Right then (Score 1) 528

Considering how the public opinion is always favored towards the underdog and the whistle-blower, it is seriously debatable whether Amazon would take this kind of risky decision by themselves. Any business would rather weather the few DDOS attacks for a few days and grin and bear the loss, instead of being seen as an "evil company". Instead, it is definitely the American government twisting their arm.

You're right. American consumers love nothing more than a foreigner posting classified information that puts national security, diplomatic relations, and civilian and military personnel at risk while making us all look like @ssholes. Your POV != public opinion. Right or wrong, I'm not sure Amazon will alienate more consumers than it gains from this move.

Slashdot Top Deals

I go on working for the same reason a hen goes on laying eggs. -- H.L. Mencken

Working...