Who is?

I bow my head to you, sir... didn't see that one coming.

Second that. I always crimp my Cat6 cables myself. The ones you buy in the store aren't any better. We all put our pants on one leg at a time... Maybe use Heat-shrink tubing for more ruggedness (if required) but that's it. Besides, you're upgrading to 20Mbit and you're running Cat6? I'd just use Cat5e since it's easier to crimp and you get about 600-800 Mbps.

ACTUALLY, the methods and applications of neurofeedback are widely disputed and science has yet to proof that everything the neurofeedback practitioners tell us is true. Thing is, you're basically telling me that if I concentrate too hard, myy brain gets damaged. Without scientific proof that statement opens up a Box of Pandora. Hm... I probably should quit my job to preserve my higher brainfunctions. 8 hours of concentrating a day can't be good.

Since the day when being "tortured" requires you to suffer from organ failure or death.

Coincidentally, members on other websites who wish to remain anonymous are also given the nickname "Anonymous". I'm convinced that has nothing to do with the fact that they wish to stay anonymous but rather that they, too, must be members of a secret and dangerous group called "Anonymous"!

/sarcasm

And this adds to it. Of course Saddam commited enough warcrimes to warrant prison for life, but humilitating a prisoner, forcing him to sign his own photo and then hanging him is a distasteful way of dealing justice.

You think they're going to fix the<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/technology/technologynews/5105

There is a great website, tweetCC, that allows you to license your twitter posts (should you use that service) under a Creative Commons license.

There is no constitutional right to privacy.

I'm not American and technically you may be right that there is no constitutional right to privacy. However:

"The Constitution does not specifically mention a right to privacy. However, Supreme Court decisions over the years have established that the right to privacy is a basic human right, and as such is protected by virtue of the 9th Amendment. The right to privacy has come to the public's attention via several controversial Supreme Court rulings, including several dealing with contraception (the Griswold and Eisenstadt cases), interracial marriage (the Loving case), and abortion (the well-known Roe v Wade case). In addition, it is said that a right to privacy is inherent in many of the amendments in the Bill of Rights, such as the 3rd, the 4th's search and seizure limits, and the 5th's self-incrimination limit."

You could also GZIP it first!

No. The old heise.de article said they didn't have a warrant. The original article on wikileaks.org also claimed thed didn't have a warrant.

Correction: they DID have a warrant. The original articles just claimed that the warrant wasn't sanctioned by a judge.

You're right in that they had the permission of a judge. However, as you can read in your linked article, this is a recent update. The information wasn't available when I wrote my post.

Yes it will. Acquiring the list or being in possession of the list is also illegal. Basically, with the new law, even if you don't look at it, you're storing child pornography (most likely for later use, you filthy bastard).

As i said, it's enough to TRY to acquire the list to get you in jail for as long as the government wants.

You don't understand. LOOKING at the list is illegal and punishable by up to 15 years of jailtime. The list is classified.

Worse. Since January 1st, there is a new law which even makes TRYING to acquire the list by ANY means punishable.