the studio that produces a movie ALREADY makes profit most of the time in just the first day of screening of the movie. in a week, they go over 25% or 50% of their costs or more depending on the movie.
why the FUCK they should be able to continually make more money on the SAME product, despite they made a product and sold it for up to 50% profits in the first week of its operation already ? why the fuck should i continue to pay to see the same movie, if its to be on dvd, online or whatever ?
So if I spend a year to produce a product and then make a monetary profit in the first week it goes on sale then my product should immediately become free and I shouldn't receive any more money for it? Who decides how much profit I should make before my product becomes free, the state? It was my understanding that in a capitalist economy that I make a product, and sell it at whatever price I think will make me the most money based upon demand.
are car factories allowed to keep charging you on the car you buy ? every time ? without rendering you a new service/addition with it, or without giving you a new car ?
Yes. I don't know where the hell your from, but here EVERY time I go down to the Nissan dealer and try to get another copy of an XTerra they charge me for it. Even if I just want a backup copy.
I'm not really sure what the analogy is you're trying to make here. You pay once for a song and then you can listen to it as much as you please. If you're buying the same exact song more then once then your doing it wrong.
explain me, why the FUCK should content industries should be slighted favorably in that regard. and why the fuck should production industries, who produce and sell products ONE TIME to a customer, should have to keep producing a product every time they need to make a sale ?
Because a digital picture of a car is not a car. A digital recording of a song IS a song. What is your suggestion, that a band play one concert, an artist paint one painting, a movie have one showing, and charge enough for it to make up for the production costs and then let digital replicas be free thereafter?
Or does it make just a wee bit more sense that if you want their digital product that you pay for that file with the agreement you won't share it with other people, and if the price is more then you wish to pay, then you simply don't buy it until price is lowered to a value YOU deem acceptable? In your case apparently, you should wait until they offer it for free.